Spoken communication is more always powerful than written communication. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some make the pragmatic argument that whether written communication or spoken communication is more powerful. Although verbal communication will affect the listeners’ mind immediately, I believe that writing has much more influences based on the evidence recorded.
Advocates of verbal language considere it as a powerful communication tool that it has the power to make listeners act immediately. The inspiring videos of the creators on TED Channel are outstanding examples. Spoken communication allows speakers to bond a more emotional level with their listeners. When listeners are conveyed positive messages such as ways to overcome pain, how to grow rich by those inspires who perform their talk in a very compelling, powerful style, they could be motivated to transform their mindset and positively act to achieve the same level of success.
Despite these undeniable arguments, I believe that the written language is still more influential based on the fact that the written evidence cannot be distorted. For example, legal documents that, once enforced on paper and signed with a high-ranking body, are more valuable than discussions in the form of communicative language by policy-makers. Legal documents will be steel evidence that could not be strained to enforce the law in accordance with the instructions of the government, which is able to create the social order as ever.
In conclusion, oral communication has an immediate impact on listeners, I still claim that written language is more influential because its values have been authenticated and cannot be falsified. The communicators are advised to choose the suitable form of communication based on the specific circumstances, which helps them achieve effective communication with others.
- Children s education is expensive In some countries the government pays some of or all of the costs Do the advantages outweigh its disadvantages 84
- The graph below shows changes in young adult unemployment rates in England between 1993 and 2012 85
- The chart above gives information about the age of women in Australia when they gave birth to their first child in 1966 1986 and 2006 78
- In many countries today people in cities either live alone or in small family units rather than in large family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 61
- TV channels show more men s sport than women s sports Why is this the case Should TV channels give equal time for women s sport and men s sport 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, for example, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1980.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57746478873 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27321519469 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574647887324 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 629.1 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4075454586 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.75 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1875 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3125 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307337548615 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108743639977 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102511368388 0.0667982634062 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199644844133 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103392969836 0.056905535591 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.