People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world.
What are the reasons for this and how can people learn more about the natural world？
Currently, humans do not know specifically about the necessity of the ecosystem, which is essential for their survival. There are several reasons for this, but also a number of measures that we can take.
First of all, maybe people understand that the environment needs preserving, but as it can bring about financial benefits, they neglect that thinking and just care about the short-term benefits instead of the long-term ones. Therefore, people exploit all the natural resources, which provides them high revenues to increase their profits. Take logging, as an example, forests and jungles, known as the lungs of the Earth, are being destroyed heavily now for trading since this is a high-income industry. As a result, many natural disasters having an adverse effect on the life of humans occur, such as soil erosion or severe floods. The other cause is that despite being taught how important nature is, people still do not have the awareness of protecting it. For instance, some individuals deliberately throw litter on the streets and beaches, hunt wild animals illegally and dump toxic waste into the seas by design. This results in the presence of plastic in the oceans, the extinction of rhinos and the death of marine creatures.
However, to lessen the problem, the main idea is that governments and the public must join hands together. Policymakers should launch some propaganda campaigns to raise the awareness of their people, but those plans need to suit different age brackets. To illustrate, as for kids and youngsters, the message can be conveyed through vivid videos and real illustrations, including animations or stories on television about how important the ecosystem is and what the repercussions are if the natural world is kept on being polluted. As for adults, authorities should issue strict regulations about protecting the environment. Take Singapore, as an example, anyone who lets garbage on the roads will be fined for $10. Consequently, everyone will realize and pay more attention to the dangers threatening the planet now: global warming, natural depletion and so on. They should stop polluting the Earth and reuse whatever they can instead of throwing away.
In conclusion, the major causes of this occurrence are primarily to do with human’s greed and ignorance. To address this, social campaigns are effective methods to provide everybody with basic knowledge of environmental problems.
- 3 Some people think that shops should not be allowed to sell food or drink that has been scientifically proved to be bad for people s health Do you agree or disagree 61
- It is expected that there will be a higher proportion of older people than that of young people in many countries in the future Do you think it is a positive or negative development 84
- Some people feel that the legal age at which people can marry should be at least 21 To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
- What are the causes and effects of poverty 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, as for, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2048.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 387.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29198966408 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80626579223 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 176.041082164 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633074935401 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 622.8 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.037311887 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.777777778 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.94444444444 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323846058263 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756583751127 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670550826655 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154509970725 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0775523485676 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.