In many nations, people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units, instead of large, extended family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend?
In many cities, there has been a growing trend towards living alone or in nuclear families,as opposed to living in extended family households. Although there is certainly downside of living in nuclear families or living alone, this trend does have an array of benefits.
On the one hand, this trend does have some beneficial aspects. First, since many young people do not wish to live the traditional lifestyles of their parents or grandparents, living alone allows them the freedom to do as they please without having constant judgement or criticism. Second, due to the reality that older people find difficult to live the hectic, fast-paced lifestyle of modern cities, they are likely to opt to live a slower-paced lifestyle in the countryside during their retirement. For instance, in Vietnam, numbers of older people chose to lead a tranquil life in rural areas instead of cities full of activities.
On the other hand, this trend also brings several drawbacks needing consideration. Firstly, living away from grandparents somehow results in the lack of closeness in families, which probably has adverse impact on children. This is because children will have less interaction and influence from grandparents, and potentially miss out on important life lessons that can be taught by grandparents having a wealth of invaluable experience. Secondly, as parents and grandparents get older, they may suffer a number of mental and physical health problems, and due to living alone, they are often lacking in the care and attention they need from their children. For instance, numerous surveys have revealed that approximately 60% of old people living alone admitted feeling lonely and not being able to do housework themselves.
In conclusion, although living in small family households have some potential drawbacks, advantages of this trend could easily eclipse the disadvantages. Besides, there is good chance that this trend will persist to increase in the foreseeable future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-19 | nobodycrush2003 | 78 | view |
| 2020-03-19 | nobodycrush2003 | 78 | view |
- Cycling is a healthier and more environmentally friendly form of transport Nevertheless cycling is getting less popular What are the reasons of this trend What can be done make cycling more popular 89
- Online shopping is increasing dramatically How could this trend affect our environment and the kinds of jobs required 89
- Nowadays some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees Why is this the case Is it a positive or negative development 84
- Nowadays most people try to balance between work and other parts of lifes Unfortunately not many achieve this balace What are the problems of this Suggest some solutions to solve the problem Suggest some solutions to solve the problem 84
- Nowadays some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees Why is this the case Is it a positive or negative development 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , as
...ards living alone or in nuclear families,as opposed to living in extended family ho...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1676.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37179487179 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86072729979 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580128205128 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1889411134 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.923076923 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.30769230769 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260001692162 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0988168315693 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072149562872 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179897763631 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0765725623211 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.