The internet is a great source of information and has opened up opportunities for people to learn all over the world. is all information reliable on the internet? what could be done to control information online?
Over the last few decayed information plays a vital role in the world and people are thirsts of it. Utilizing internet technology raises many possibilities for people to gain knowledge, which is a greater source of information. This essay will outline all the information on the internet is not a reliable and a possible solution to regulate them.
It is a fact that the internet is a place with a great wealth of knowledge, which is collaborating with individuals, communities and organisations. It is full of various learning materials as forms of news, blogs, web portals and sites thus this is a great tool, although the content on those may not always be authentic. Because some may take advantage of this medium to spread false facts to deceive or raise hatefulness. For example, according to Oxford research done in the year, 2010 35 per cent websites and blog new happened to be sources of the untrustworthy. Moreover, following imprecise medical diagnostics that has published on a personal blog may cause critical side effects or health issues. So the content we are referring to the world wide web could be orchestrated with false material.
However, improving public awareness will be a great way of reducing the impact effectively, which could be done by the governments or with the public-private partnership. It should always encourage users to refer or read authentic and legitimate sources published by the government or approved organisations. Although, the authorities can regulate to some extent abiding the rules and regulations. It is not possible to fully control or regulate, but making the public knowledgeable will be impacting on the publishing false data.
To conclude, it is important to bear in mind, while we utilise this tool, it might provide with unreliable info. By regulating and most importantly increasing the public awareness practically we can contain this matter.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-08 | mrezabarfi | 73 | view |
| 2020-03-19 | daalex | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-20 | Chinthaka | 42 | view |
| 2019-09-27 | Diya si | 93 | view |
| 2019-05-02 | Megha Gupta | 67 | view |
- Some people think that school children should learn practical skills such as car maintenance or bank account management along with academic subjects at school Do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people say that technologies such as mobile phones is disrupting social interaction Do you agree or disagree 92
- Some people think that the best way to stay fit is by joining a gym while others think doing everyday activities such as walking and climbing stairs is sufficient Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views and 73
- You have eaten at a restaurant and it was such a terrible experience that you have decided to inform the manager by letter of what happened and that you want your money back 1 Describe the problem 2 Explain why you are unhappy 3 Say what you would like to 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 222, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...practically we can contain this matter.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, may, moreover, so, then, thus, while, as for, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29773462783 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1706127753 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576051779935 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.7689847527 49.4020404114 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 109.133333333 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73333333333 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253353610466 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756320250772 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693636273542 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141709137981 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114337858624 0.056905535591 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.