Online education or interactive education is the best?
We are living in an age when Industry 4.0 has changed our life dramatically into the world of revolution and automation. This is the reason that many people opine that online education can bring many benefits to students while others believe interactive education is still the best way. This essay will discuss the merits and demerits of both approaches of education these days.
To begin with, there are some advantages in attending in an online class. First and foremost, virtual class creates the opportunity for students to have freedom to take lessons instead of being present themselves physically in the lecture room. For example, they can learn lessons provided in anytime and anywhere just by a computer that have connected to the Internet. Secondly, online education takes an integral role in reducing costs for all schools. Due to the fact that there is a huge amount of money that have been spent on improving, upgrading or buying new facilities annually, this approach helps them reduce these costs since the campus is not used more.
On the other hands, there is no denying that face-to-face teaching also has many benefits for learners. Firstly, the traditional approach is more effective than the new one. For detailed, having directly interaction with teacher give students a chance to efficiently understand the lessons or receive acute feedbacks, which makes sure that they realize their confused mistakes and correct themselves. Secondly, for the learners, it provides motivation for those who are lazy or not self-awareness. For example, online education can’t be sure that indolent students taking the virtual class are listening carefully what teacher have given during tutorials or whether they could be able to get good grades without any supervisors.
In conclusion, both online education and interactive education have its own merits and demerits on the way how effective they are to help students learn better. However, it goes without saying that schools should choose the proper approach for the development of their students instead for any unessential other reasons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-29 | nguyenanh9182 | 89 | view |
| 2023-05-16 | Ediyorbek521 | 89 | view |
| 2023-04-05 | dindin_8 | 58 | view |
| 2022-01-18 | Lê Thúy Nga | view | |
| 2021-12-02 | kevann | 89 | view |
- Some people think that children perform better in a single sex school compared to a mixed school To what extent do you agree or disagree 74
- The peformance of staf can have a significant impact on the success of a company What can companies do to increase staff productivity 89
- Some believe that people will purchase a product based on their needs and advertising is not needed To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Consumers are facing an increasing number of advertisements from competing companies To what extent do you think consumers are influenced by advertisements What measures can be taken to protect them 89
- Consumers are faced with increasing numbers of advertisements from competing companies To what extent do you think are consumers influenced by advertisements 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 154, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...fective they are to help students learn better. However, it goes without saying that s...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, while, for example, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1771.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28656716418 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67820589429 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597014925373 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0381833106 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.066666667 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.73333333333 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2624261697 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0908961537101 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132561269112 0.0667982634062 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191731814975 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106313576156 0.056905535591 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.