The graph shows the information about the international conferences in three capital cities in 1980 – 2010.
The given line graph illustrates the quanlity of global conventions hosted in particular metropolitan areas over the period of 30 years.
It can clearly be seen that there was a considerable fluctuation of global meetings in three cosmopolitan climes from 1980 to 2010. The organization of worldwide sessions in City A and city B reached higher than city C at the beginning of the period. However, since 2000 the number of multinational conferences of city C experienced the highest figure of three cities.
In 1980, city A conducted approximately 35 international conferences, which was the highest point for all cities within 30 years, while under 30 meetings were held by city B. In contrast, there were not any sessions hosted in City in the same year.
After only 20 years later, the figures for worldwide meetings that rose sharply to peak at 35 in 2000, and then declined lightly by around three sessions in 2010. The rates of city A and B showed the significant changes through the period, both conducting more or less 25 meetings each in the final year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-12 | lamphuong1208 | 56 | view |
- The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Someland from 1960 to 2000
- People living in big cities face several problems What are these problems What can be done by governments to solve these problems 82
- Nowadays most people are not as and active as they were in the past What are the main causes of this solution Suggest some possible solutions 61
- More people live alone today than they did in the past Do you think this is a positive or negative development 89
- Governments should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion Others support building more and wider roads Discuss both of these viewpoints and give your opinion 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, while, in contrast, in particular, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 893.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93370165746 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89623988789 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618784530387 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.857408061 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.625 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258482137102 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102811069438 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426518311368 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136674706292 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0733591251503 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.