The bar chart below gives information about the percentage of the population living in urban areas in the world and in different continents.
The provided bar chart illustrates not only the proportion of people who lived in urban areas in the 1950-2007 period but also the predictable data of it in 2030 in various parts of the world.
From the first glance, the whole world and a diverse mixture of continents, which seemed to increase considerably throughout a 57-year in the past, tend to go up gradually in the next 23 years in the figure for citizens living in cities.
It is noticeable that the rate of the average population from all over the world will go up approximately two-fold from 1950 to 2030, at 60%. Besides, North America contributed to the highest percent of people moving from rural to cities, which accounted for 64% in 1950 and 79% in 2007. Nevertheless, the least African living in urban areas throughout the 1950-2007 period with 15% and 37% respectively. In addition, the largest disparity in the past belonged to Asia, at 24%, in spite of this considerable increase, the percentage will be still lower than the world average in the next 23 years.
Looking at the column chart in more detail, we can see that in 2030, in comparison with the world average the trend will stay constant. To be more precise, 9% of Africans and 6% of Asians will be under the mean data in the whole world. Conversely, three continents namely Europe, Latin America, and North America will have higher rates than from the world, which will be responsible for 78%, 84%, and 87% in order.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-28 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 56 | view |
| 2022-04-24 | Sarina2021 | 78 | view |
| 2021-05-23 | mitss9 | 56 | view |
| 2021-05-23 | mitss9 | 67 | view |
| 2021-01-08 | mayaaminova03 | 78 | view |
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 67
- The bar chart below shows the numbers of men and women attending various evening courses at an adult education centre in the year 2009 The pie chart gives information about the ages of these course participants 87
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 73
- Some people choose to eat no meat or fish They believe that this is not only better for their own health but also benefits the world as a whole 89
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, conversely, first, look, nevertheless, so, still, in addition, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1196.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 254.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70866141732 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61943309188 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 106.607317073 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55905511811 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 350.1 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.050405631 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.888888889 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2222222222 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4444444444 5.23603664747 199% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175205335814 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744253650919 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580102644298 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115021437073 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0615685825597 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.