labour saving devices such as dishwashers and communication devices such as tools as computers are supposed to make our lives easier. However, some people argue that these devices only make them more difficult . Does modern technology reduce or increase stress?
Give reasons
Undoubtedly, majority of individuals tend to believe that applied science is bestowing mankind with ample ameneties to lead a serene lifestyle. Whereas, a few people vocalize that such innovations purely constitute stress and anxiety rather than making scenario easy. However, this essay asserts that prime purpose of appliances is to provide leisure time as well as an extensive labour saving tools which could not be overlooked at any ground.
Even though, hefty power is being consumed briskly by automatic machines, supplying uninterrupted assitance is one of the great services to offer. Seemingly, working section of pruralistic scoiety is unable to snatch enough time to devote towards their closely associated relations such as offsprings and elder.This is due to the hectic working scehdules to earn bread and butter for living which drive denizens to work around the clock but with availbility of electronics devices parents can spare quality time for their family commitments . To exemplify, as the reseacrh of Queens University of london, accomplishing office work through computers has made life less complicated so far in comparison of bygone decades.
Furthermore, work by automation can not be compared with manual because unlike human it does not require energy to perform tasks. Owing to which, consumers can channelsize their energy in other constructive chores which also marginalise the amount of fatigue in the body. Moreover, such astounding outbreaks of science are not less than a blessing for the employed women and grey popluation. It would be biased to bypass the data published by 'Tribue' stating that markets of euippments are higly flourishing by leaps and bounds due to the heavy demand among all age groups of people across the globe.
To conclude, although some deleterious impacts of technology are transparent but turning faces is not an impeccable option. In this ever-progressing information techology ear, technophobic will not be having a place in upcoming unforeseen future. Therefore, restrcited usage never brings the unfourtune which is again ultimately lies in the hands of humans.
- You and your family are living in rented accommodation in an English speaking country You are not satisfied with the condition of some of the furniture Write a letter to your landlord In your letter introduce yourself explain what is wrong with the furnit 78
- In some countries younger people are neglecting their right to vote What problems does this cause and what are some of the possible solutions 78
- In modern times young adults are spending less time with their families and more time with their friends Why has this change occurred Do you think parents should force their children to spend more time at home In modern times young adults are spending les 84
- obestiy is an increasing concern in majority of the nations today To what extent do you agreee 11
- Your family is going to move to another town Write a letter to the Principal of a local school asking if they will accept your son Describe his academic achievements and scope of interests 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 312, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
... relations such as offsprings and elder.This is due to the hectic working scehdules ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 541, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...uality time for their family commitments . To exemplify, as the reseacrh of Queens...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, well, whereas, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1804.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46666666667 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92209836065 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.687878787879 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.3489244143 49.4020404114 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.769230769 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3846153846 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84615384615 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106043202118 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0291313516402 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0329526386776 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0548649686387 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0265301156204 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.91 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.