The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.
A fleet glimpse at the pictorial of 2 schemes delineates data on the figuration of recreational area nestled at Arnold avenue in 1920 as well as the modifications occurred until now.
At the onset, it is manifest that this park named nominated as a Grange park undergo many alterations and upgrading and the park correlate correctly with the atmosphere of our modern era.
From 1920 onwards, there was an ordinary fountain located in the focal point of the park. In stark contrast, currently this old fountains gave its way to the rose garden surrounded by seats around it. Moreover, stage of musicians was situated at the east side as well as it replaced by the amphitheater for performing concerts. The access to this park is entered by Eldon Street which is located in the north. However, at the present time, there is another type of ingress entered via underground for this park.
Furthermore, in 1920, there were rose garden along with pond for water plants housed in the north-west modernized and turned into café and playing area for children. Finally, the glasshouse sited on the right-hand side converted to the water feature.
- In some countries many more people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past Do you think this is a positive or negative development 78
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 73
- Most people have forgotten the meaning behind traditional or religious festivals during festival period people nowadays only want to enjoy themselves What extent do agree and disagree 56
- Some people regard video games as harmless fun or even as a useful educational tool Others however believe that videos games are having an adverse effect on the people who play them In your opinion do the drawbacks of video games outweigh the benefits 67
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
A fleet glimpse at the pictorial of 2 sc...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, however, if, moreover, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 953.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96354166667 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7152106192 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630208333333 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1232668562 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.888888889 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150840667216 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0629514496745 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639922552227 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.088022231988 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662697020413 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.