Some people think the government should spend money on faster means of public transport. However, others think money should be spent on other priorities (such as the environment). Discuss both views and give your own opinion
It is thought that it is necessary for the government should invest national budget in developing the public transport system, while others say that public money should be given top priorities regarding environmental preservation. Personally, I believe that the environmental protection is as important as enhancing the infrastructures of transport.
On the one hand, the speedy public transportation brings about reap of benefits regarding time-saving and safety. Firstly, individuals are able to save a large amount of time on commuting from place to place thanks to faster means of public. A typical example of forms of public transport including high-speed rails, airlines and coaches shorten the time of travel. Secondly, a well maintained road network is a must for the well-being of dwellers in any country. It is obvious that Viet Nam has not had an extensive road system, which causes numerous commuters died due to road accidents.
On the other hand, environmental protection is also taken into consideration by the government because of the development of human’s life. One reason is that the authorities should spend money raising people’ awareness of the environmental importance. For instance, Vietnamese government launches the campaign that the all residents restrict to consume non-biodegradable goods such as bottled water or plastic bags throughout the country. Another reason is that providing funding for renewable energy such as wind power or solar energy can be more beneficial to human’s health. It means that installing solar panel will save the consumption of electricity, therefore, this type of energy is more environmentally-friendly.
In conclusion, it seems to me that the investment in both public transportation and preserving environment are fairly equal in the development of human society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-07 | longdotrungga | 78 | view |
| 2022-06-07 | longdotrungga | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-18 | lennie.butera | 84 | view |
| 2021-01-15 | Huy Do | 73 | view |
| 2020-11-16 | lhm.ils | 73 | view |
- Some people think that they can go to the gym to remain fit while others think that there are other better ways to do this Discuss both views 89
- Television sporting shows such as Olympics to motivate the youth who do not like to exercise much Do you agree or disagree 89
- People in the current generation are not fit and active This will cause health problems in the future What could be the reasons for the inactivity and suggest solutions for this issue 84
- Some people believe that price is the only consideration when buying something Do you agree or disagree 82
- Some people believe that elderly employees are more useful to a company while others say young employees are better Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 483, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...llers in any country. It is obvious that Viet Nam has not had an extensive road s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60573476703 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.43129644605 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602150537634 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9867708339 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.307692308 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4615384615 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6153846154 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235187698312 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0728206034432 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741205539039 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139159097143 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0671947256073 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.