In most successful organisations, some people believe that communication between managers and workers is important, while other people said that other factors are more significant. What is your opinion?
Many opinions think that the success of prosperous organizations is mainly resulted by communication between managers and their staff, whereas others assume that other factors are more crucial. While the importance of communication in workplaces cannot be ignored, I believe that the success of an organization combines many different factors.
On the one hand, effective communications play an integral part in organizations. Firstly, good interactions between members enable businesses to respond to changes faster and more accuratly. In case of emergency situations that require collaborations of many different parts, good communication is the key to solve problems effectively. Secondly, workers can process a bigger burden of work because of accelerating the flow of information. Many state-of-the-art technologies nowadays are applied to improve communicating capability such as applications allow to share a common customers’ database, and therefore, they can optimize processing duration and procedures as well.
On the other hand, a successful organization has to take many other factors into consideration. In terms of promotion, companies and NGOs both need to build up their marketing departments aiming to enhance their public images. For example, the Red Cross is a well-known NGOs, which professionally carries out many charities all over the world. It is clear that this organization would face many obstacles if it cannot build up their reputation. From another perspective, external relationships cannot be underestimated. For example, many corporations have to allocate a considerable amount of money on keeping in contact with their customers as well as conducting many market research to maximize profits.
In conclusion, while I partly agree that all the most successful institutions always have to maintain good interactions between the board and their inferiors, I think there are many other aspects that are also required equally.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-25 | Phuong1810 | 61 | view |
| 2021-11-02 | Truong Khanh Ha | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-03 | Hân Hân_1515 | 73 | view |
| 2020-11-16 | KatNguyen | 56 | view |
| 2020-08-01 | 9ngóntay | 84 | view |
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The diagram shows the small-scale production of smoked fish 61
- the diagram below show how sand dunes are formed 61
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- the graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the uk from 1990 to 2005 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 321, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...the success of an organization combines many different factors. On the one hand, effective c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 256, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...tuations that require collaborations of many different parts, good communication is the key to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 561, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'sharing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: sharing
...g capability such as applications allow to share a common customers’ database, and there...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 19, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...procedures as well. On the other hand, a successful organization has to take ma...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, as to, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7724137931 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38715486415 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627586206897 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8206630803 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.571428571 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6428571429 7.06120827912 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197865736634 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0695155814465 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0909653667809 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14435836381 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102330386056 0.056905535591 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.