The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts compare the expenditures per year of a school in the UK in three separate years: 1981,1991 and 2001.
Overall, it is clear that teachers’ salaries occupied the largest cost to school, and whereas spending on furniture equipment and insurance grew dramatically, there were drops in expenditures on resources like books and other workers’salaries.
It is can be seen that the highest spending was on staff’s salaries. While other workers’ salaries witnessed a decrease from 28% in 1981 to only 15% in 2001, teachers’pay remained the greatest cost, reaching 50% in 1991 and ending at 45% in total spending of 2001. And expenditure on insurance saw a rising from 2% to 9%, which always being the lowest cost in three separate years.
Before falling to 9% in the end of period, spending on resources such as books had increased to 20% by 1991. In contrast, furniture and equipment cost saw an opposite trend when it declined 10% between 1981 and 1991. Then, the cost had a considerable increase, standing at 23% in the end year. Similarly, expenditure on insurance saw a rising from 2% to 9%, which always being the lowest cost in three separate years
- Scientists have found the environmental problems are still serious because many people have not changed their lifestyle Why do they refuse to change their lifestyle and how do we encourage them to 84
- The diagram below shows two different processes for manufacturing black tea Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 73
- n some countries young people have little leisure time and are under a lot of pressure to work hard in their studies What do you think are the causes of this What solutions can you suggest 78
- The graph shows the amount earned by graduates of different age group in 2002 It includes those with a degree whose with a higher degree postgraduate and those with other qualifications 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
similarly, so, then, whereas, while, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.48453608247 94% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 5.05154639175 158% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.03092783505 165% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 32.9175257732 15% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 26.3917525773 140% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.85567010309 130% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 979.0 937.175257732 104% => OK
No of words: 198.0 206.0 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94444444444 4.54256449028 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.78020617076 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96543792027 2.54303337028 117% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 127.690721649 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565656565657 0.622605031667 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 271.8 290.88556701 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.463917525773 431% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6804123711 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 16.3608247423 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.2144803216 44.8134815571 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.777777778 76.5299724578 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 16.8248392259 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 4.34317383033 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155470654345 0.216113520407 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729258238213 0.0766984524023 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0802247958989 0.0603063233224 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125962796369 0.12726935374 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0946440674228 0.0580467560999 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 8.37731958763 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 70.7449484536 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 7.45979381443 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 8.71597938144 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 7.59969072165 101% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 41.2886597938 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 8.62886597938 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 8.54432989691 126% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.