medical technology
The importance of medical technology is responsible for increasing the average life expectancy which was always debatable ha s now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate my views for favoring the positive impact of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact is that the medical technology increasing day by day. Consequently, mostly people choose medical subject because medical technology demand is very increase. Another pivotal aspect of this trend the medical technology is responsible for increasing the average life expectancy. Needless to say,, all these merits stand in a good stead.
Elaborating my viewpoint there are some more merits but one of the crucial effects is that mostly students choose the medical subject and decrease the all course for example b.com, b.ca, fashion designer, and etc. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favor of this trend.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of increasing the medical technology are indeed too great to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-29 | mohammadsabet | 77 | view |
| 2022-12-21 | Nina Tsarevich | 80 | view |
| 2022-07-15 | Nawal Fatima | 72 | view |
| 2022-07-15 | Nawal Fatima | 77 | view |
| 2021-11-01 | Alireza.r.m | 85 | view |
- the importance of working from house using computer technology 65
- Environmental pollution 55
- more information available online 77
- Children learn best by observing the behavior of adults and copying it. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 55
- A good listener is better than a good talker in a social situation Do you agree or disagree 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 413, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive commas
Suggestion: ,
...average life expectancy. Needless to say,, all these merits stand in a good stead....
^^
Line 3, column 206, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
... example b.com, b.ca, fashion designer, and etc. Hence, it is apparent why many are in f...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, while, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 31.9359605911 72% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1222.0 1207.87684729 101% => OK
No of words: 230.0 242.827586207 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31304347826 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81006831446 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 139.433497537 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578260869565 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 391.5 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.3439502342 50.4703680194 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.090909091 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9090909091 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 7.25397266985 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329628291237 0.242375264174 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136191417019 0.0925447433944 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147885934577 0.071462118173 207% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218768521624 0.151781067708 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142949610828 0.0609392437508 235% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 12.6369458128 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.