whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work.
The importance of design of building impact on people's life and work which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. However, the substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. So, this essay will further elaborate my views for favoring the positive impact of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
To begin with, there are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that people are easily attract to fabulous buildings. Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that benefits can be attributed to the design of the building and people working in the well-designed building feel proud and have a positive attitude towards the work. Needless to say, all these merits are stand in a good stead.
Elaborating my viewpoint, there are some merits but one of the crucial effect is that penetration of natural sources such as air and sunlight in the building can have the tremendous effect on the workforce. Besides, unlike the electric light and air-condition air, the maximum touch of natural sources keep away an inevitable diseases which are immensely important for the people. Hence, it is apparent why many are against in favor of this trend.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of design of building will have a positive impact on people life and work indeed too great to ignore.
- Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged producers it is responsibility of the producer to avoid extra packaging of product. give your views any example with your own experience? 77
- government to allow road vehicle 55
- In under developed countries, tourism has disadvantages and can be said opposite as well. give your opinion? 88
- government should reduce their investment 77
- economical gap between the rich and poor is widening. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 327, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'disease'?
Suggestion: disease
...natural sources keep away an inevitable diseases which are immensely important for the p...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, while, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1391.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 273.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09523809524 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69235005324 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 139.433497537 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556776556777 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.594558741 50.4703680194 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.454545455 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8181818182 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338664683153 0.242375264174 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117106369213 0.0925447433944 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136208515769 0.071462118173 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23310775348 0.151781067708 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127280518858 0.0609392437508 209% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.