Topic 22/6/19: Government should invest in teaching science subjects rather than other subjects in order for a country to develop and progress. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many people believe that if the authority use all national budgets for teaching science subjects, their country will undergo greater development. Though it is undeniable that science does wonders for the world, I refute the idea that all students should forcefully study this subject at school.
There is no doubt that science goes hand in hand with technological and medical advances. Firstly, the scientists have invented various automatic machines to assist or even replace the manual labor in factories, which renders the manufacture process more productive. Besides, a wide variety of medicines and clinical devices has been innovated to provide higher healthcare services for patients thanks to science. For instance, during the outbreak of the novel Corona virus, Vietnamese researchers managed to create the virus kit detecting infection. Therefore, should students study science, they will probably be able to make immense contribution to their national economy and wellbeing.
Nevertheless, I have reservations that making science a compulsory module in the curriculum will definitely bring out national progress. To begin with, it is well acknowledged that there are multiple intelligences and each individual will have their own strengths and weaknesses. For example, some people would be visually, bodily or musically gifted which is more suitable for arts or sports majors rather than science. Even if they followed the science-related career path, without passion or talent, they would only be defeated by more academic individuals. Moreover, as the job market demands diverse occupations such as educators, police officers and farmers, forcing all children to learn science will merely result in an imbalanced dystopian where every person is a so-called scientist or technician.
While scientific achievements are impressive and valuable worldwide, it is unrealistic for the government to invest in a science-oriented education system. Science should remain an optional subject for interested students with clear job prospects to pursue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-22 | Nav IELTS | 61 | view |
| 2023-04-22 | Nav IELTS | 61 | view |
| 2023-04-22 | Nav IELTS | 61 | view |
| 2021-08-09 | navpreet12 | 89 | view |
| 2020-06-11 | oyondev007 | 73 | view |
- Topic 07 06 19 More and more people are becoming seriously overweight Some people think a solution can be to increase the price of fattening foods To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Topic 25 04 19 In many countries today people in cities either live alone or in small family units rather than large family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 84
- Topic 06 04 19 People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world What are the reasons for this and how can people learn more about the natural world 89
- Topic 23 5 19 In many cities there is little control on the design and construction of new homes and office buildings and people can build houses in their own style What are the advantages and disadvantages of such a situation 78
- Topic 18 06 19 Many people disagree with a school policy which forces children to learn new languages To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in fact, no doubt, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1759.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74836601307 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98029361436 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.669934640523 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.456494308 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.642857143 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176723644245 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0574942648877 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503393900251 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11998076269 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599132929677 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.07 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.61 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.