TPO 32 integrated strange noises might have three mutually exclusive sources male and female ocra giant squids other submarines

Essay topics:

TPO 32 integrated
strange noises might have three mutually exclusive sources.
male and female ocra.
giant squids
other submarines

The article asserts that some Russian submarines recorded strange noises and there are different hypotheses about their sources. The teacher completely overthrows all the assumptions mentioned by the author even though she accepts that this phenomenon is debating. In the following, her explanations are discussed thoroughly.

First of all, the reading claims that ocra males and females were the main sources of the noise. However, the professor refutes this idea and says this is highly unlikely even though she thinks it is plausible. She insists that these creatures mostly live near sea surface; therefore, the submarines could not hear them, mainly because they were very deep down the ocean, and the sound of those animals could not reach those submarines.

Secondly, the passage posits that giant squids (a sea predator) were making those sounds. The lecturer rejects this scenario as she refers that first sounds were recorded during 1960's and disappeared after about twenty years surprisingly. Since giant squids have always lived in the area and never leaved there, it is not acceptable to refer to these animals as the sources of the noises owing to the fact that they could not make the noises only for a certain period.

Tertiary, the essay upholds that other countries' submarines were the cause of the noises for they were snicking around the location. Nonetheless, the educator opposes this theory insomuch as she claims that the source moved fast and changed its direction really quickly. Therefore, the sound could not be made by submarines although their engines made some noises and accompanied quackers. Moreover, she acknowledges that those new submarines were constructed by state-of-the-art technologies which enabled them to operate more silently.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-04-17 Seyed Armin Mirhosseini 80 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 23 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 13 12
No. of Words: 280 250
No. of Characters: 1463 1200
No. of Different Words: 167 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.091 4.2
Average Word Length: 5.225 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.47 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 109 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 78 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 50 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 33 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.538 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.915 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.615 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.342 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.562 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.151 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4