Most people have forgotten the meaning behind traditional or religious festivals; during festival periods, people nowadays only want to enjoy themselves. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In recent years, the question of whether the meaning behind traditional festivals is losing or not has been receiving a great deal of public attention. Although some only want to enjoy themselves during these days, the majority remain the traditions of their countries or religions.
There are several reasons why people believe that festivals are occasions for them to enjoy themselves. First, since citizens are occupied with a substantial volume of work these days, they tend to stay home during festival periods. In fact, national festival days could be opportunities for people to take a break as they have devoted their time and energy to daily work, which discourages people to participate in these occasions. Second, with the development of technology, people, particularly youngsters, tend to glue their eyes to screens to get a sense of relaxation. For example, motions and attractive effects performed on Tv will be more appealing to young generations than going outside and sitting in traffic for hours during these days, which results in the gradual disappearance of cultural identities.
Nevertheless, most individuals also tend to enjoy the national cultures beside themselves. In most countries, people still preserved traditions by taking part in traditional festivals. For instance, Tet plays an important role in Vietnamese culture, and customs on this occasion have remained over generations. During Tet periods, the Vietnamese refurbish their houses, pay a visit to relatives and make the best wishes to one another, and children receive red envelopes from older generations. Therefore, those imply that people still aware of preserving traditions despite the hectic pace of life.
In conclusion, although some people mainly want to enjoy themselves during festivals, others opt to celebrate these days with their families. By understanding the reasons for these celebrations, people could preserve cultures in the modernized world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-13 | zanzendegi | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-19 | phamanhtu | 56 | view |
| 2023-01-29 | adoke | 67 | view |
| 2023-01-15 | yavarmohammadi | 61 | view |
| 2022-10-26 | khanhkhanhkhanhkhanhkhanh | 73 | view |
- More and more companies are allowing employees to work from home DO you think this is a positive or negative development 78
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children s sports between 2008 and 2014 The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period 78
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 71
- The three pie charts below show how the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 18, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
In recent years, the question of whether the meaning behind traditional festival...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, nevertheless, second, so, still, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1658.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54515050167 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94007136679 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61872909699 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8186683242 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.428571429 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276412960021 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0960865951091 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567750274294 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171645335812 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0276976136956 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.