Do you agree or disagree? It is important to have hobbies that are totally different from one’s work.
Some worker has various types of hobbies when they have opportunities to spend their time on them. Some workers select their hobbies which is related to their work. Oppositely, some workers spend their free time with hobbies which are isolated from their work. Nowadays, these decisions are markedly controversial. In my opinion, there is no question that people who choose independent hobbies from their works are better than people who select hobbies like their works. They are able to improve their basic knowledge, ease their stress from the works, and establish new communities without relativity to their works.
First, workers polish their standards of knowledge from their hobbies which are not pertinent to their works. It is clear that they are able to achieve more diverse ideas from their hobbies. For example, one of the workers who design a new house has hobbies to go to drink coffee wherever. Then, it is so impressive for him that one of the coffee shops uses fascinating colors on the wall. After that, he comes up with the idea that he should design the wall as the wall in a new project.
Secondly, the stress of workers from their works is comforted by independent hobbies. People become stressed when they work at the company and focus on their tasks such as new project, their significant tasks, and the presentation in front of executive people. In the worst situation, they decide to suicide themselves from the heavy pressure. However, workers are able to escape from thinking about their works by hobbies which are not completely related to their works. Then, they can enjoy the hobbies from cardiac, so their stress from their works is gradually culminating by them.
Finally, the isolated hobbies from the works make new enjoyable environments for workers. They can communicate with people, unlike their colleagues. When people talk about their tasks with the fellows even outside their company, their emotion is satisfied by boring. However, people who have friends from their hobbies their works are able to enjoy conversations such as today’s dine, their children, and news with them without thinking about their work life.
To sum up, I surely believe that isolated hobbies from the works have benefits for workers by comparing them with hobbies which are related to their tasks. It is true that they brash their knowledge, mitigate their stress, and create new opportunities for communication.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-22 | akimasa7887 | 71 | view |
- which do you think is the most important factor to improve people s work efficiencies 1 Having a work environment which is free of noise and distractions 2 Knowing that they will be rewarded 3 Doing jobs they are interested in 68
- The company would like to invest in improving employees work Which way do you think is better to help employees become more adept to new technology to redesign the working environment to be more comfortable and spacious 79
- Do you agree or disagree It is important to have hobbies that are totally different from one s work 71
- which do you think is the most important factor to improve people s work efficiencies 1 Having a work environment which is free of noise and distractions 2 Knowing that they will be rewarded 3 Doing jobs they are interested in 66
- Doing which activity do you think can better help you strengthen the friendship between you and your friend having a good time together with your friend solving your friend s problem with him or her 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, as to, for example, such as, in my opinion, it is true, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2043.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 399.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12030075188 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48071942833 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.451127819549 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 597.6 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.901610268 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8636363636 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1363636364 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54545454545 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158085796665 0.236089414692 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745467002942 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562842078228 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122549632795 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0170274595471 0.0645574589148 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.