Students leave high school without learning the way how to manage their money. What are the reasons and solutions of this issue?
There is a truth that young high school graduates leave school without sufficient knowledge or skill in personal money management. The reasons are that financial control is not included in the curriculums and most parents do not know what to do or if they did but they do not know if it is right.
As a matter of fact, high school's education programs do not consist of financial management. Schools only concentrate on teaching major subjects such as Math, Literature, Chemistry, etc. In other words, academic knowledge is more invested instead of preparing students soft skill such as how to manage their money in high school education. Furthermore, the only money that students receive is from their parents and this is typically in the form of pocket-money, which is spent for individual purposes. Therefore, young people only really learn how to use money, and not how to earn, save or manage it wisely.
However, there are a number of viable solutions to help students deal with this problem. First, basic money management could be added as a compulsory subject for students in their high schools years, which would help equip them with knowledge and skill to manage their own personal finances when they leave school, move out of home and enter employment. The second option is to be able to enhance awareness of this issue through education at home. Parents can prepare their children with knowledge about the family's finance, which is more popular in western nations. By this, their kids are adequately educated in such matter and they will have a maintain successful and independent financial situation after graduating and leaving home.
In conclusion, although personal money management is a big problem for a lot of school leavers, this situation can be resolved with appropriate changes.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-03-04 | Trần Thị Ngọc Mai | 84 | view |
2021-12-18 | vuhieuquy | 67 | view |
2021-12-11 | vuhieuquy | 59 | view |
2020-11-27 | minhtrile010@gmail.com | 71 | view |
2020-11-09 | klaralinh864 | 78 | view |
- The diagram below shows the recycling process of plastics Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The charts below show the proportion of people’s total spending in a particular European country was spent on different commodities and services in 1958 and in 2008. 89
- The tables below show results of a survey of urban residents opinions related to various aspects of life in 1980 and 2010 79
- Students leave high school without learning the way how to manage their money What are the reasons and solutions of this issue 56
- The pie charts indicate changes in the proportions of energy produced in a country from 1983 to 2003 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 646, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...cated in such matter and they will have a maintain successful and independent financial si...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, really, second, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, as a matter of fact, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1513.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09427609428 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67872151973 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548821548822 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0227189205 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.384615385 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8461538462 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.84615384615 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.424185558159 0.244688304435 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13409360881 0.084324248473 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.07518458254 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225025017224 0.151304729494 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0724340322928 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.