Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online.
Is this a positive or negative development?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Some universities, nowadays, open some online courses for their students so they can study on the Internet. From my experience, while I agree with studying online has its advantages, I believe that studying at school overshadows the benefits of studying online.
Face-to-face studying has a great deal of advantages. Firstly, the traditional method can help students connect with their professor better than the online method. The communication between students and teachers is more effective. For example, at university, there is no sources which can distract the attention of students and teachers. However, at home, students might lose their attention due to their atmosphere such as their neighbors, their family, or any source else. Studying at school, moreover, give students and teachers the effective atmosphere to learn and teach. University students might have a postive atmosphere which can help them pay their attention effectively without disturbed sources. Besides, professors have a good condition to teach and help their students approach the knowledge which they are taught.
On the other hand, the online studying has its benefits. For example, students and professor can connect and contact each other if they have Wi-fi or mobile data to use the Internet. Students can replace the ways they are approaching their knowledge. They do not need to go to library in their university, they can search the knowledge in the online library where it is more convenient for students.
To sum up, while I agree with the point which is openning some online courses is a positive development, I believe that online courses cannot replaced the traditional way which has a long historical distance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-18 | Killua | 73 | view |
| 2021-03-17 | elisabetta_fedele | 73 | view |
| 2021-01-02 | join2saurav | 73 | view |
| 2020-10-05 | AhaanIshaan | 73 | view |
| 2020-10-05 | AhaanIshaan | 73 | view |
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 56
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by governments rather than private companies Do you agree or disagree 61
- Most people have forgotten the meaning behind traditional or religious festivals during festival periods people nowadays only want to enjoy themselves To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any r 73
- Nowadays some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees Why is it the case Is it a positive or negative development 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 259, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are no sources'?
Suggestion: there are no sources
... effective. For example, at university, there is no sources which can distract the attention of stu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, while, for example, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1439.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34944237918 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81954515051 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524163568773 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.2271329108 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9333333333 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9333333333 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2241745734 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0843327910625 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618017714472 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155519277853 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562988411531 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.