The graph below gives information on the differences in clothing exports from three different countries.
The line graph shows data about the numbers of exporting cloths countries from Colombia, Japan, and Myanmar.
It is clear that exports from three countries generally fluctuated over the period shown. Also, a dramatic change was seen in the number of clothing exports in Myanmar.
In 1999, Japan was the most successful clothing export country, at around 600 million dollars per year, 100m higher than the revenue of Colombia. Colombia was the second-highest country, with roughly 480 million per year. However, no figures for Myanmar are given in that year.
There is no significant change was seen in Colombia, which fluctuated between 600 million and 500 million per year. Also, Japan saw a small rise to 610 million per year for the whole 4 years period but the exporting number of Myanmar rose sharply to around 920 million in 2001 and became the top exporting country in the graph. However, it eventually dropped to 420 million in 2003 and had the lowest figures for international trade of clothing.
- the chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 56
- The diagram shows the process by which milk and related products are produced Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features Write at least 150 words 90
- The charts below show the performance of a bus company in terms of punctuality both actual and target what actually happened compared to what the company was trying to achieve and the number of complaints and passengers
- The graph below gives information about changes in the birth and death rates in New Zealand between 1901 and 2101 61
- The diagram below shows how the Australian Bureau of Meteorology collects up to the minute information on the weather in order to produce reliable forecasts 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 846.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03571428571 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5116226427 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589285714286 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.7391256327 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156860413636 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0816333526006 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0889015473341 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143059879474 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0910143438449 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.