Most government money should be invested in teaching science rather than any other subjects in order for a country to develop. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people think that citizens can obtain benefits from teaching science that is invested by government, while others disagree.
On the one hand, I believe that investing in scientific teaching has various benefits. Allocating money to science, which means will dramatically promote developments in technology. For consumers, the application of technology in food production and transportation has greatly increased the variety of food available in supermarkets and grocery stores, thus it will provide consumers with a wider range of choices. Canned and bottled foods, for example, make life easier, especially for city residents whose busy lifestyle have not enough time to prepare lunches or diners. Besides, industrialized have been promoted quickly under circumstances of learning science, resulting in the advent of robots, which often is considered very much important to human society nowadays. Robot works can work in some situations that are considered too dangerous to human beings such as rescuing in fire scenes or cleaning up radioactive waste. Also, Nano-robots can be putted into patient’s body to operate complexed surgery that is impossible for surgeon.
On the other hand, however, I think that the development of a country not just limit spending money on scientific education. There are various options that the governments should be considered, for instance, if such subjects involving in developments of the infrastructure and underground water disposal are operated successful, which also represents progresses in a country.
In conclusion, I personally believe that whether a country develops or not should be judged from different aspects. Apparently, the most important thing is that the scientific and other subjects should be invested by the government proportionally.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-05 | woshixiefeiji | 67 | view |
| 2020-05-05 | woshixiefeiji | 67 | view |
- Some people believe that people who read books for pleasure can develop more imagination and language skills than those who prefer to watch TV To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Most government money should be invested in teaching science rather than any other subjects in order for a country to develop To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Today boarding schools are becoming more and more popular in many countries Some people think this is a positive trend in the modern world To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Most government money should be invested in teaching science rather than any other subjects in order for a country to develop To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people think adults should learn practical skills by themselves while others think they should learn with teachers in the classroom Discuss both views and give your own opinion 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, besides, however, if, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1543.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73605947955 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13639225409 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646840148699 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3915226557 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.583333333 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1666666667 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261342200361 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0941539798305 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730344371322 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177900394272 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0753732758477 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.25 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.