Some people prefer to take small classes in which the professor can remember every student's name. Other people think it is better to take big classes. Which do you prefer and why?
In some schools, students have several options for choosing various types of classes. While some students prefer to take the lectures where there are few students, some decide the big classes. However, it is so controvertible for them to make the decision to attend their classes. In my view, students should take small lectures. They can approve easily connection with their teachers, more concentration on their every lecture, and make sophisticated friendships with their friends.
To begin with, students will easily communicate with their professors by small classes. Some teachers have to remind students’ name and communicate with them, so they will be so exhausted. As a result, their mental and physical capacity will not make attention to each student. On the other hand, they will be able to provide these students with equal education if students choose small classes. Hence, the opportunities for consuming their time with their teachers are gradually improving, so they intrigue about the contexts of classes.
Secondly, small lectures establish a place where students more focus on their classes than in large lectures. Generally Speaking, professors can not give students group work in large lectures because there are huge amounts of people in the room. Moreover, people cannot concentrate on their tasks if they listen to noisy sounds and speaking by others. Nevertheless, the small classes are profound quite. Thus, the study attitude of students will be highly polished.
Finally, the advanced friendship between students will be earned in small lectures. These classes are organized by approximately few quantities of people. Hence, Some students hold the chance to talk with others in these classes. Once they make friends in the classes, they construct schedules about hanging out with them. Consequently, their friendships are enhanced little by little.
To sum up, students should attend more small classes than in large classes. I surely believe that they are able to establish the opportunities to communicate with their professors, focus on their classes, attain a deep relationship with their friends.
- which do you think is the most important factor to improve people s work efficiencies 1 Having a work environment which is free of noise and distractions 2 Knowing that they will be rewarded 3 Doing jobs they are interested in 66
- To help the first year students adapt to new college life university has two plans One is to offer a week orientation The other is to ask to the freshman to meet with their senior year schoolmates regularly According to your opinions which plan is better 70
- Some people think that some lessons for young children age 4 8 which include video games can serve as effective and interesting ways of learning while others think that these lessons are quite distracting and can be seen as a waste of time What is your op 60
- The company would like to invest in improving employees work Which way do you think is better to help employees become more adept to new technology to redesign the working environment to be more comfortable and spacious 79
- 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 398, Rule ID: QUIET_QUITE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'quiet'? 'quiet' means 'silent', 'quite' mean 'very' or 'to a moderate extent'
Suggestion: quiet
...theless, the small classes are profound quite. Thus, the study attitude of students w...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, hence, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, thus, while, as a result, in my view, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1813.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 332.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46084337349 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74655691767 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503012048193 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.1896818846 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.4090909091 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0909090909 20.6045352989 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72727272727 5.45110844103 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181559570528 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682878994967 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568534205227 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114688705279 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492198421667 0.0645574589148 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.