Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: “It is better to read books on an electronic device than it is to read traditional books on paper.”
No one can deny that there are both positive and negative aspects of reading books on an electronic device or reading conventional paper books. If I were asked to choose, I would prefer reading on an electronic device. It is my firm belief that reading on an electronic device is more beneficial for a number of reasons, and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, reading books on electronic device is preferable because it is convenient to carry an electronic device like mobile phone/tablets. People can take his/her electronic device easily while traveling so that he/she can spend the time effectively. Because we can download different books/articles from internet easily and store on our electronic device. Later, we can read these materials at our convenient time. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my own personal experience. Few months ago, I was travelling from Bangladesh to Senegal to attend a seminar official purpose and the journey time was almost 24 hours. At first, I was bored after boarding on airplane because I have nothing to do and even I do not know any one to talk. Then I opened my cell phones and started reading novel, which helped me to recover from the loneliness during this long journey. That travel time was not a bored one because of the advent of electronic device. For this reason, I prefer to read on an electronic device over paper books.
Secondly, to read on an electronic device is economical. Now a days, almost every people has his/her own cell phone and he can download almost every books/articles by spending nominal amount money, which is cost effective in compare to buy hard copy books. Drawing from my own experience, when I was student at Master’s level, I need to read at least three or four writer’s book for the same course, which was very expensive and literally quite impossible to afford for buying all these books. But, it was possible for me to survive because of the convenience electronic device. My university authority provided me the soft copy all these books so that I can read these books. It is certainly clear why I like to read books on electronic device rather than reading hard copy books.
In the light of above mentioned reasons, I strongly believe that reading books on an electronic device is more convenient that that of paper books.
- Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to read books on an electronic device than it is to read traditional books on paper 73
- The government in Littleville plans to build a large mall in a newly constructed zone just outside the city. Littleville hopes to attract many wealthy clients who it believes will shop at the Littleville Mall's many planned boutique stores. Ten years 67
- The city council of Town x has proposed reducing the city’s electric expenses by switching all the lights in the public buildings from incandescent bulbs to light emitting diodes (LEDs). The switch would be made gradually as the old incandescent bulbs 63
- Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation s history Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones How important is it to maintain old buildings Should history stand in the way of progress 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 383, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ese ideas in the subsequent paragraphs. To begin with, reading books on electron...
^^^
Line 2, column 773, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anyone'?
Suggestion: anyone
...ve nothing to do and even I do not know any one to talk. Then I opened my cell phones a...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 57, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: Nowadays
... on an electronic device is economical. Now a days, almost every people has his/her own ce...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 61, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
...an electronic device is economical. Now a days, almost every people has his/her own ce...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 365, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'writer' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'writers'.
Suggestion: writers
..., I need to read at least three or four writer’s book for the same course, which was v...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 123, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: that
...an electronic device is more convenient that that of paper books.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, then, while, at least, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1988.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 411.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83698296837 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7229375635 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484184914842 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 651.6 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1967642647 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.55 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348277435243 0.236089414692 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137913437187 0.076458572812 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115450642655 0.0737576698707 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.272954491169 0.150856017488 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451675491711 0.0645574589148 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.