Nowadays celebrities earn more money than politicians. What are the reasons for this? Is it a positive or negative development?
Evidences suggest that celebrity’s income is vastly greater than that of the politicians. There are several reasons responsible for this. In my point of view, it is a positive development which is explained in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, firstly, the prominent reason for celebrity’s wealth is popularity. They are countless fans to support them. In other words, they are the center of concentration and act as role models for the youth. They help to start a new business by supporting them and acting in the advertisement for a particular product. Most energy drinks or sports equipment adverts are played by players and athletes in order to increase the sale of machines and products. They even use other means to support the business by wearing their t-shirts with the product logo and invite their fans to imitate them. For instance, the survey done by “The Time” reveals that the advertisements which are played by famous personalities increase the sale of the product by 78 percent as compare to the advert done by a common man.
Furthermore, these actors and famous personalities tend to interact with the people on social media or in-person and even try to know their actual problems. The more some stars earn the more they help in charities. For instance, India actor Salman Khan is a well-known personality in the people because of his good deeds as he helps people in their difficult times. The latest one is, during the harsh time of COVID -19, he distributed a large amount of food among the poor people so that no one can sleep an empty stomach. In short, most of the celebrities pay high capital expenditures to the charitable offices which help the poor people and even should have established a school for the deprived section of the society.
To conclude, the prominence of the celebrity is the most important reason for their high salary than other jobs. In my point of view, it is a positive development as they become helping hand for poor people and charitable societies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-10 | mahyarr | 84 | view |
| 2020-12-19 | ssssohailaaaahmad | 67 | view |
| 2020-12-11 | apoorvachikara18 | 84 | view |
| 2020-09-25 | Lee Hwa | 89 | view |
| 2020-06-26 | Jitenramen | 61 | view |
- In some societies the number of crimes committed by teenagers is growing Some people think that regardless of age teenagers who commit major crimes should receive adult punishment To what extent do you agree 76
- People are becoming too dependent on the Internet and phone Is it a positive or negative development 78
- Some people argue that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others believe that it is better to try and improve such situations 67
- You stayed at a hotel recently and forgot your clothes there Write a letter to the hotel manager and say When and where did you stay Describe your clothes What would you like the manager to do about it 73
- Write a letter to a friend who just moved into a new house that you are sending a gift to Include What the gift is Why you chose it How it will be delivered 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, well, for instance, in short, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1682.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91812865497 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78034968654 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540935672515 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5655802978 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9411764706 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1176470588 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94117647059 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19541014808 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733162740959 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706514245439 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153768575909 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0817103158376 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.