In schools and universities, girls tend to choose arts while boys like science. What are the reasons for this trend and do you think this tendency should be changed?
There has been a marked difference in subject preferences between girls, who often enrol in arts-based courses, and boys, who select science subjects to study. There are a number of factors that may cause this issue including cognitive differences and chance of success in the two fields between two sexes, and I personally believe that it is unnecessary to apply changes to this tendency.
The aforementioned situation can be attributed to gender-specific characteristics and ability. Firstly, girls are often patient and careful, so they are attracted to subjects that require tremendous self-discipline and patience such as language classes while male students are often more intelligent and better at logical thought, therefore, they suitable with several considerable analytical fields to excel at, for example, maths or physics. These differences suggest distinct career opportunities for science and arts, so boys and girls both want to pursue the path where they have more competency. In fact, the U.S' Psychology Science Public Internet publication shows evidence of different career advancement between males and females in the science field, with males being more successful.
In my view, it is rather unnecessary to make changes to this trend. Initially, students opt for different environments where they can best cultivate their aptitude. In addition, if they were obliged to take part in unwanted classes, it would cause negative outcomes, especially lost interest in learning. Furthermore, freedom of choice to decide should be respected. To be more specific, students should be allowed to select their favourite subjects, regardless of gender, so that they can feel that they are respected and listened.
In conclusion, there are some elements contributing to the subject preference of student. This, however, makes sense to remain unchanged.
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops Do you think it is a positive or negative development 78
- The charts show the main methods of transport of people travelling to one university in 2004 and 2009.Summarise the information be selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below gives information about U S government spending on the research between 1980 and 2008 88
- People living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life What are these problems Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns 84
- The diagram below shows the recycling process of plastics
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 618, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...ey have more competency. In fact, the U.S Psychology Science Public Internet publ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1585.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60070671378 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02392578588 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628975265018 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.4191934234 49.4020404114 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.923076923 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7692307692 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181171816037 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639505773571 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447676922468 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0990170207812 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237903329739 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 618, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...ey have more competency. In fact, the U.S Psychology Science Public Internet publ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1585.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60070671378 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02392578588 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628975265018 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.4191934234 49.4020404114 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.923076923 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7692307692 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181171816037 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639505773571 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447676922468 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0990170207812 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237903329739 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.