Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
Nowadays, almost everyone has a job to make himself survive in this society. In this statement, it raises a problem about what is more significant, the quickly working with risking of mistakes or slowly with everything ensured. And it proposes that working in high speed and risking making mistakes is more important. On the contrary, I support the idea that slowly with high accuracy is preferable. Here are my reasons:
First of all, what workers should pay attention to is the quality not the number of the products. It is due to the reason that customers always choose the product with high quality and little flaws. No one wants to purchase something with poor workmanship. There used to be to clothes shop opened in my hometown. One was operated by a young tailor who always made clothes quickly and sometime pretty rough, the other was managed by an older man with slowly working but elaborate clothes. It turned out that the young bankrupt in the end because of few customers. This case reflects that quality is the more crucial than the quantity.
Also, people who work quickly always have low efficiency because the occurrence of mistakes slows down the speed in contrast. With the high working speed, people tend to take less care about the next step, and once this step has flaws, it always influences the next. As manufactories are operated in a way called steam-lined process, when the former step runs into a break because some workers carelessness, the next steps would all be affected. Thus it would slow down the efficiency of whole factory. So, working slowly with seeking for perfection step by step would somehow even surpass the whole producing speed of working quickly and risking of mistakes.
Sometimes the speed should not be too slow to make the producing process come to a fail, however. The world is changing in a rate that many people cannot even imagine. Once you slow down, others would be superior to you silently. As in software industry, many managers sometimes must launch the products that have some little leak in it. It is because once you wait to make it perfectly, you competitors who have the similar idea would launch this and apply for potent so that he can make the profit that is now earned by you. That is to say, we should also clear about the importance of working quickly.
In conclusion, I contend that the quality of product and efficiency of producing demand working slowly to make sure almost everything as is suggested by me being more important. But what also should be noticed is that too slowly to ensure the perfection sometimes would somehow lead you to lose some chances.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For a success in a future job the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In today s world it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In today s world it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In today s world it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 278, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'clothe'.
Suggestion: clothe
...h poor workmanship. There used to be to clothes shop opened in my hometown. One was ope...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 387, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
...mer step runs into a break because some workers carelessness, the next steps would all ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 447, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
..., the next steps would all be affected. Thus it would slow down the efficiency of wh...
^^^^
Line 9, column 310, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... somehow lead you to lose some chances.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, thus, in conclusion, in contrast, first of all, on the contrary, what is more, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2192.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 455.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81758241758 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47474284147 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485714285714 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 679.5 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8880972869 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.3333333333 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9583333333 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288267481029 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0796843899806 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0772845338727 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170975644991 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0801510667664 0.0645574589148 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.