Some people prefer to live in a small town. Others prefer to live in a big city. Which place would you prefer to live in? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.
In the modern era, the majority of people now place great emphasis on living's environment. Living in an enormous city or in a miniature town are obviously distinguished. Some people prefer living in a suburb, while others believe that living in a modern metropolis is better. As far as I am concerned, I strongly prefer to live in a large city, and I will explore the reasons further in the subsequent paragraphs.
First and foremost, living in a metropolis allows people to have a lavish life. A number of public infrastructures, such as theaters, department stores, and museums are built around the city in order to fulfill people's needs. Moreover, there are more medical facilities that are ready for servicing citizens in case of emergency. I can attest to this from my own experience. When my family and I visited Buriram, a small city in the northeast region of Thailand, we underwent a car accident, and our car had broken down. My brother had to go to the nearest hospital as quickly as possible. However, as Buriram had only one main hospital, and we can only drive a car to that place, it took more than two hours to commute. Fortunately, we were finally safe, but this scenario clearly proved that there were not enough requisite facilities in the suburbs.
Secondly, transportation in big cities is more convenient than in small cities. Although many modern metropolises confront a traffic congestion, individuals are able to commute with state-of-the-art public transportation, such as trains, public buses, and taxi services. Therefore, people who live in enormous cities can travel faster than those who live in the suburbs. To illustrate this, I live in Bangkok, and I sometimes drive a private car to my workplace. When traffic in Bangkok is unbearable, I can take the Bangkok Skytrain system instead, and it is punctual and economical. Moreover, if I am not pressing, I am able to travel by public buses or boats. As you can see, there are various types of transportation that support Bangkokians to choose a proper one.
In conclusion, I firmly maintain the belief that living in tremendous cities is more preferable than living in small towns. This is due to the fact that people will be more excited to live with full facilities, and cutting-edge transportation in the enormous cities is also convenient.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-02 | Kazeemolatide | 35 | view |
| 2021-09-02 | WatermelonUCLA | 63 | view |
| 2021-08-11 | nida fatima | 70 | view |
| 2021-04-19 | ursula | 60 | view |
| 2021-02-26 | edsonsimoes | 60 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the opinion: People who cannot accept the criticism from others will not be successful at working in a group. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement technology has made children less creative than they were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Should a city preserve or destroy its historic building use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 83
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement? technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment-doing things they like to do rather than doing things they should do. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'livings'' or 'living's'?
Suggestion: livings'; living's
...y of people now place great emphasis on livings environment. Living in an enormous city...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1943.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 392.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95663265306 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02070009448 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533163265306 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 622.8 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 9.0 1.86738351254 482% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1111295767 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5238095238 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330703674591 0.236089414692 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0949933636709 0.076458572812 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106584425024 0.0737576698707 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227278064304 0.150856017488 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134805654588 0.0645574589148 209% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.