Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion on this? Do you think this is a good or bad change?
Recently, the phenomenon of "large shopping malls are replacing small shops" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the preposition that small shops might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that malls can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the climate standpoint, large shopping malls can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that needing to fewer trips and reducing the gas emission are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered discounts of large malls. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both helping the environment preservation and protecting natural resources distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of economics science, without the slightest doubt, replacing small shops with large stores might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of the unemployment rate. Moreover, fundamental aspects of eliminating small stores can relate to the reality that the demerits of malls can pertain to cheating in goods' prices. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downside of large malls were correlated positively with the societies' need, the local authorities would ultimately address retailers' issues. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of satisfying consumers' demands.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt vigorously to support the idea that the merits of large shopping malls far outweigh its downsides. Not only do the virtues of the best prices prove the significance of the wholesale but also pinpoint providing the job opportunities implications.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-07-21 | Gohar Khan | 75 | view |
2020-06-03 | sattar_iust | 89 | view |
2020-04-20 | manraj123 | 72 | view |
2019-12-26 | Prabu | 84 | view |
2018-05-21 | Vaka143@2 | 90 | view |
- The graph below shows the demand for electricity in England during typical days in winter and summer The pie chart shows how electricity is used in an average English home Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make com 89
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do the advantage of this situation outweigh the disadvantages 89
- We have entered a throw away society and fill the environment with rubbish What are the causes and what are your solutions 88
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 84
- Every year several languages die out Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 129, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1669.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 289.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77508650519 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16254268353 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 139.433497537 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660899653979 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4762733251 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.083333333 104.977214359 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0833333333 20.9669160288 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257846470784 0.242375264174 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0797159172147 0.0925447433944 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644876072379 0.071462118173 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143213501606 0.151781067708 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0629687415852 0.0609392437508 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 12.6369458128 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.54 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.11 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 55.0591133005 209% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 129, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1669.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 289.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77508650519 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16254268353 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 139.433497537 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660899653979 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4762733251 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.083333333 104.977214359 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0833333333 20.9669160288 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257846470784 0.242375264174 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0797159172147 0.0925447433944 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644876072379 0.071462118173 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143213501606 0.151781067708 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0629687415852 0.0609392437508 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 12.6369458128 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.54 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.11 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 55.0591133005 209% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.