Question:
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Some people believe that with new technologies education of the young generation becomes easier than in the past, but there are doubts about whether such a statement bears much truth. However, the opponents still challenge that position, stating that children spend too much time on cell phones and online games which makes the task of teaching them more challenging. While there is to consider and contrast between both fields of thought, I concur with the latter opinion. Still, this area deserves further speculation and scrutiny which I will delve into.
To begin with, when children spend much of their time on cell phones by watching entertainment videos and photos they learn to concentrate on the information no longer than a few minutes. On the other hand, education requires children to be able to concentrate on the material much longer than a few minutes to comprehend it, which means that cell phones learn kids the opposite habits which is needed for learning. In contrast, in the past, there were no cell phones and for adolescents, it was easier to learn to focus on studying for a long period. For example, my younger brother spends near three hours a day sitting in the cell phone where he watches different videos and chat with friends. Tremendously hard is it for him to learn not only because he thinks it is boring but also that every ten minutes he is distracted by cell phone. As a result, he has very low grades in the school and it is harder for him to learn. In comparison, when I was at school it was much easier for me to learn because I did not have a cell-phone. If he had not had the cell phone he would have learned better.
Furthermore, because there is a lot of video games which are fascinating children want to spend as much time playing them as possible which makes the process of education harder. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my brother's example. My sibling Andrew relishes to play Minecraft after school. Thrilled he was in such a way that he could play it for five hours a day. It means, that he almost did not accomplish home tasks and he had the lowest grades in his class. In contrast, when I was at school there were no computer games which means that I did not have such a powerful distractor factor in education. If my brother had been born a few decades earlier it would have been easier for him to learn.
In light of the aforementioned reasons, I strongly believe that because children spend too much time on cell phones and games educating them is a harder task than in the past. This is because not only that gadgets learn the opposite habits which are needed for education but also because they are more captivating than learning.
- Question Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For the successful development of a country it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children five to ten years old than to spend money on universiti 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Question Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Grades marks encourage students to learn Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 73
- Question Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone online games and social networking Web site Use specific reasons and exa 73
- Question Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In today s world it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct Use specific reasons and examples to support your an 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'technologies'' or 'technology's'?
Suggestion: technologies'; technology's
Some people believe that with new technologies education of the young generation becom...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1036, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rn because I did not have a cell-phone. If he had not had the cell phone he would ...
^^^
Line 3, column 1092, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...ad the cell phone he would have learned better. Furthermore, because there is a lot...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, still, while, for example, in contrast, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.0286738351 209% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2258.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 488.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62704918033 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70007681154 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49707905147 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.450819672131 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 684.0 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.532752467 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.523809524 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2380952381 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250151732533 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0837576157254 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0814229421393 0.0737576698707 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190473706902 0.150856017488 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.076011419687 0.0645574589148 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 58.1214874552 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.