People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Decision making is a skill prevalent in those people who are willing to create an impact that is sound and is beneficial not just in current times, but in the long run. Leaders all around are expected to be pragmatic and take decisions that are driven not by sentiments, but by logic. Falling in line with this school of thought, I firmly believe decisions based on emotion are faltering and poor in nature and decisions based mostly on logic are more befitting for two reasons.
To begin, it is important to consider the current situation around us in the world and how people who are more practical and less sentimental are successful in the long run. Countries all around the globe have committees and divisions that are responsible for making decisions in a more stolid, rational and feasible manner, rather than delving in a sentimental dialogue that is too far-fetched. To illustrate this, we can consider the diplomatic relations between countries such as India and China whose situation clearly describes the argument under contention. India had started a narrative of India-China brotherhood in the early 1960 and that is also the time when India defended relinquishing its seat at the United Nations for China, as the permanent member. The Indian diplomats defended their decision as an act of friendship towards the Chinese, thus portraying an example of defending an emotion decision with logic. On the other hand, land dispute between China and India in the north-eastern part of Kashmir triggered an onslaught from China's side, proving it to be a decisive move in the future of these countries and domination in the region. Thus it can be clearly seen that people who making sentimental decisions and then try to cover up their decisions with logic is not the right way of handling situations and can prove deleterious in the long run.
In addition to that, history is an amazing encyclopedia of information that has lessons abound with different teachings that one can lift. Multiple dynasties lost control of their regions due to poor decision making, a lot of which were emotional decisions. To corroborate the argument with a historical incident, we can consider the annexation of the north western part of India by the Khilji dynasty. The ruler of the opposing force to the Rajputs of India, Alauddin Khilji was a highly ambitious and unscrupulous ruler. He had a treaty with the king of Rajputs, after the first few encounters, that he would return to homeland. The poor decision making by the Rajputs led them to open the gates for the opposing force, as a gesture of honor. But emotional decision making is something that is not solid and backed by sound reasoning, which resulted in the debacle of the Rajput dynasty as Khilji attacked the Rajputs in a fearsome manner, thus eradicating them from their homeland.
Although, it can be argued that emotional decisions then backed by logic are always poor in nature. When dealing with one's family or loved ones, it is important to consider the emotional aspect of one's decision and it can be justified to compromise on the best option, for the more preferred one. But any emotional decision not based on sound logic will always have a weaker foundation and thus be susceptible to flaws and exposure, in the long run.
In conclusion, we can say that people who make emotional decisions and then back them up with logic are poor decision makers, in a holistic sense.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-30 | yixova3193 | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-09 | Truss | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | Adesina Boluwatito | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-01 | shamika@25 | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-14 | RIYA MODI | 58 | view |
- Undergraduate students majoring in Business or in the Sciences should not be required to take any courses in the Humanities since those courses won t benefit their future careers Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree 66
- The city of Winston has two large department stores Namen and Roscoe Namen is known for its high end designer fashions while Roscoe is known for more affordable fashion options Both Namen and Roscoe are each considering opening another store in the growin 68
- Paleo diets in which one eats how early hominids human ancestors did are becoming increasingly popular Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food especially bone broth a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours They believe 57
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 73
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader it is not as important as a leader s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 480, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gic are more befitting for two reasons. To begin, it is important to consider th...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 337, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ational and feasible manner, rather than delving in a sentimental dialogue that i...
^^
Line 3, column 1160, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...countries and domination in the region. Thus it can be clearly seen that people who ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 921, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a fearsome manner" with adverb for "fearsome"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... dynasty as Khilji attacked the Rajputs in a fearsome manner, thus eradicating them from their homel...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...radicating them from their homeland. Although, it can be argued that emotional decisi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 119, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...lways poor in nature. When dealing with ones family or loved ones, it is important t...
^^^^
Line 7, column 198, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ant to consider the emotional aspect of ones decision and it can be justified to com...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, then, thus, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.3162921348 194% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 85.0 58.6224719101 145% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2865.0 2235.4752809 128% => OK
No of words: 582.0 442.535393258 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92268041237 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.91168771031 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69930833995 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 273.0 215.323595506 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469072164948 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 903.6 704.065955056 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9075756631 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.428571429 118.986275619 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7142857143 23.4991977007 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.38095238095 5.21951772744 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341805167351 0.243740707755 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111035343275 0.0831039109588 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079959896072 0.0758088955206 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234266354124 0.150359130593 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546111792466 0.0667264976115 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 142.0 100.480337079 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.