Research into medical treatments are essential to improve health and fight disease. Who do you think should fund this research: individuals, private companies or governments?
Medical research and experiments are central pillars in our fight against illness and disease. Personally, I believe that the government and corporations should share the financial burden to achieve more breakthroughs in the field.
It is sensible for the government to invest in research into medical treatments. The government is indebted to its taxpayers and has an obligation to channel taxation into essential services, which encompass health care. However, investments in hospitals and facilities alone are not sustainable in the long run since the people in power are not solving the root cause of the problem. As a result, while allocating money to the national health care system, the government should also sponsor laboratories in which clinical trials and research into illness and disease are carried out. In the long run, the outcomes would be more diseases will be kept at bay thanks to the findings from the labs.
On the other hand, while publicly funded research is notorious for its inertia, privately funded one could bring yield unimaginable results. Private companies should be authorized to fund, conduct experiments in medicine and treating methods to allow more discoveries. It could ease the financial burden and spare the pressure from the public in situations where medication is in desperate and urgent need. For example, private pharmaceutical companies are given free rein to pour their money and resources in search of the cure for the COVID-19, which is a current global emergency. Even though the sought-after medicine has not brought to life yet, allowing private medical institutions into this quest at least helps to appease the public fears and anxiety since they believe that these companies would be strongly motivated by the colossal profits and global attention that their discovery could bring.
In conclusion, I believe that it is the chief responsibility of the government to finance medical research. However, private companies should be allowed to step in to make a difference.
- Many people think that zoos are cruel Others think they are helpful in protecting rare animals Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 89
- Some people argue that because the Internet makes it so easy for children to access facts schools should not focus on teaching facts Instead they should focus on developing children s skills and potential and their relationships with other people To what 50
- People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world what are the reasons and how can people learn more about the natural world 82
- Oil use of major consumers 67
- Worldwide mobile phone sales in 2005 2006 share of market 83
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while, at least, for example, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1709.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.340625 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8521493403 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559375 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.8457626413 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.071428571 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317446520998 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108434742271 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662030835713 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191644094513 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270946548425 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.