The maps show changes in the village of Meadowside and the town of Fonton from 1962 to now. Write a report of at least 150 words describing the main features and making comparisons where relevant.
The given maps detail the development progress of a Meadowside village and a neighboring town Fonton over three different time periods 1962, 1985, and the present scenario.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that both the towns have expanded significantly over time resulting in easy access, improved infrastructure, and a better lifestyle.
According to the given illustration, in 1962 both the places were underdeveloped. Although Meadowside village and Fonton was equipped with an unpaved road and a railway track respectively, there was no connectivity between the two towns. However, after nearly two decades, both the towns underwent significant renovations. The reconstructed main road in the village got extended all the way to the neighboring town. In addition, enormous modernization led to the construction of housing estate along with leisure complex to the west and a super-store to the south of the main road.
In the current times, Meadowside suburbs have emerged after the merging of both the towns. The installation of a new station at the middle joint has resulted in extended track to the Fonton town. Just beside the station, a new hotel has been built, where people stay while traveling between the towns. To the south of the station, the running highway crosses through the newly constructed business park.
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015 78
- The chart shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008 89
- The graph shows the Underground Station passenger numbers in London 78
- The charts below compare the age structure of the populations of France and India in 1984 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1151.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3785046729 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03003064083 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598130841121 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 345.6 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.8259519581 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.636363636 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4545454545 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72727272727 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175722480183 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613453855981 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472372699338 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103077689295 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450740570119 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1151.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3785046729 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03003064083 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598130841121 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 345.6 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.8259519581 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.636363636 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4545454545 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72727272727 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175722480183 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613453855981 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472372699338 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103077689295 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450740570119 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.