The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 and 2010 about one university.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table gives information about the survey which was conducted in 2000, 2005 and 2010 in a particular university. There were 5 aspects and a good ratings were recorded in the percenteges.
Overall, while satisfaction of teaching qualuty, print resourses and electronic resourcdes dramatically increased over the 3 periods of time, range of modules offered was voted by the least students. Nonetheless, the percentage of the buildings/ teaching facilities remained stable.
The most stiriking increase had the aspect of electronic resources, wich almost doubled in 10 years from 45 percent to 88 percent. Meanwhile, this proportion was the same with those who selected the print resources in 2010. In addition, the most vote (89 percent) were given to the print resources in 2005
On contrast, the aspects of teaching quality and range of modules offered had the same downward trend from 2000 to 2005, decreasing by 2 percent. However, while percentages of the teching quality slightly climbed to 69 percent, the proportion of the range of modules offered marginally dipped to 27 percent erratically to it. Notibly, those who voted for the building/ teaching facilities levelled of to 77 percent during the 10 years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 73 | view |
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-02 | Awadhesh Mourya | 78 | view |
- The line graph below shows the average daily maximum temperature for Auckland and Christchurch, two sites in New Zealand, and London and Edinburgh, two sites in the United Kingdom.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and 84
- Children nowadays watch significantly more television than in the past, which reduces their activity levels accordingly. Why is this the case?What measures can you suggest to encourage higher levels of activity among children? 61
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree with this view 78
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views and 56
- Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects Other people think that in today s world subjects like Science and Technology are more important than History Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 149, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'rating'?
Suggestion: rating
...ersity. There were 5 aspects and a good ratings were recorded in the percenteges. Ov...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, nonetheless, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1031.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31443298969 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90806176935 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582474226804 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9368087079 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.555555556 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0896793665853 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0451966968523 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.085281200266 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0680927268348 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0761125763409 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.