should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things like food and education or it is the responsibility of the government of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves?
It is often thought that it is the prime responsibility of the government to secure its nation and provide essential amenities like food and better educational system to the people of its nation. But I completely agree with the opinion that rich countries should also help the under-developing and developed countries for the well-being of humanity.
Serving the people of other nations means to serve the humanity and humanity is the biggest religion of this universe. It is said that if you save single human, you have saved the whole humanity.
Firstly, some of the Asian countries like Pakistan, Nepal or Bangladesh are suffering from extreme poverty from ages. Moreover, poverty is the root cause of many problems that gives rise to other complications within the society like increased crime rate, human trafficking, diseases due to underfed. In such situations people try to commit crime to fill their empty stomachs and try to secure their families.
If someone is born in poor country, it is not his or her fault in fact it is the government and politician who should look after its nation. Government and politicians should not be profit driven. For instance, the contemporary situation, Pakistan suffering from is all because of the previous corrupt governments and politician who amassed the funds from western countries but not utilized that monetary aid for the well-being of Pakistani people.
On the other hand, western countries like US, Britain, France or Germany which are considered super powers and strong wealthy nations should help the poorer countries by charity. Undeniably, these nations have bolstered the Pakistan in many ways like providing free medications and funds. Such generous acts bring prosperity and happiness around the globe.
But, despite of prosperity, I think the poorer nations would become dependent for the aid from other countries and they may lose their enthusiasm to build their nations.
While concluding, I think we should help each other to fulfil the basic needs like food, medication, and education despite of race, religion or gender as we all are humans and we all have same level of hunger.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-13 | Waseem Akhtar | 73 | view |
- young people should go to university to further their education 73
- bringing in foreign workers to fill positions that domestic workers are unwilling to do can cause problems 73
- power of advertisement reflects the sale of consumer goods 61
- in many countries a small number of people earn extremely high salaries some people believe that this is good for the country but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level 73
- should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things like food and education or it is the responsibility of the government of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 29, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
... humanity. Serving the people of other nations means to serve the humanity and humanit...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ave saved the whole humanity. Firstly, some of the Asian countries like Pakistan, Nepal or...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 449, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...for the well-being of Pakistani people. On the other hand, western countries lik...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, may, moreover, so, thus, well, while, for instance, i think, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1807.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1776504298 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72176743984 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558739255014 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.113707444 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.466666667 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2666666667 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26666666667 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.38176352705 160% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308928016018 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0959018076208 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0760727234022 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135861024892 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0677006245729 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.