Some people think that taxation should be able to keep to a minimum as the money people earn should be theirs to do with as they wish. Others believe that people should pay a significant level of tax in order to support the public services we all depend on.
In your view, what is the fairest way to deal with the issue of taxation?
There is a common debate on whether people as the country’s citizens should pay only a minimum level of tax and spend their money on any other things or tax should be collected at a more significant amount to invest in public facilities such as transport and health care. Although it is true that we should be able to deal with money as we want, public services we rely on are of more importance, so we should pay taxes at a proper rate based on our annual income.
Many people want the government to keep taxation as minimum as possible because the money they earn should be theirs to spend at their own wish. In other words, people work for a considerable amount of income to pay for their living, they should not waste too much of that on taxes. Over 65% of people in Nevada refers to taxation as one big part that prevents them from enjoying their lives. However, I think this is hard to agree with since it will have a great impact on public inconvenience and there are other plausible solutions to deal with this circumstance.
It is suggested from some individuals that we should pay more taxes to a significant amount in order to support the nation. Taxation can be collected at different levels depending on the yearly revenue of people. This will allow authorities to develop and modernise public services and facilities such as health care, building maintenance and public transports which will benefit everyone in their living. As Germany restructures national taxation limit for citizens, the governments now have more budget for public uses and provide better utilities in both metropolitan and remote areas. In my opinion, collecting an appropriate amount of tax from the citizens is a proper way government can work on tax issues.
In conclusion, even though a smaller amount of tax allows people to enjoy the money they work for, I still affirm that paying a significant level of tax based on our annual salary to assist and support the public services is the fairest way to cope with the issue of taxation and we will get the most benefit from this in a longterm.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-17 | NeutronnzZ | 73 | view |
| 2020-06-17 | NeutronnzZ | 72 | view |
| 2020-06-17 | NeutronnzZ | 73 | view |
| 2015-12-14 | pratik_dkr1 | 73 | view |
| 2015-12-14 | vjtca28 | 65 | view |
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The diagram below shows the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes 78
- Nowadays many people choose to be self-employed, rather than to work for a company or organisation. Why might this be the case? What could be the disadvantages of being self-employed? 78
- The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, still, i think, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in other words, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1727.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71857923497 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58878736102 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489071038251 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.6122009864 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.916666667 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5 20.7667163134 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.495593218859 0.244688304435 203% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178773927346 0.084324248473 212% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117394145132 0.0667982634062 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.308301373284 0.151304729494 204% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100835667851 0.056905535591 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 50.2224549098 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.69 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 9.78957915832 179% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.