School children nowadays are not playing more sports compared to their parents in their childhood.
Do you agree or disagree? Support your ideas with examples.
Recently, the phenomenon of playing sports by children and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of parents' childhood are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that agreeing physical activity can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, playing sports can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as the advantages of a healthy lifestyle, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of sports events. Thus, beneficial ramifications of efficient schools are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, playing active games can supply the community with negative impacts, which are associated with the reality that the demerits of inefficient parents are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described rigorous sports. Hence, predicted outcomes of dismal childhood are critical.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of playing sports in schools far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of accurate comparisons prove the significance of robust children, but also pinpoint possible implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-19 | Alireza.r.m | 90 | view |
| 2020-02-20 | Alireza.r.m | 85 | view |
| 2019-05-27 | mojtaba1980 | 84 | view |
- Should individual limit the use of car and use alternative things instead to protect environment 85
- Should wealthy nations help poor countries with food and education or is it the responsibility of poor nations to improve their condition 85
- Some people work for long hours and hard to achieve success and some give importance to free time for them Give your opinion and discuss your views 77
- Imagine you have been assigned to the study of climate change Which area of climate change will you choose and why Use examples 71
- Soon retirement of workers can create job opportunities for young people discuss Give examples 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1264.0 1207.87684729 105% => OK
No of words: 222.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69369369369 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14036014843 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662162162162 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 379.143842365 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3864471515 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.909090909 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1818181818 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18610634396 0.242375264174 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583872006762 0.0925447433944 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0310619734073 0.071462118173 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100337477618 0.151781067708 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00867359415455 0.0609392437508 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.96 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.