Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.
In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?
Has this become a positive or negative development?
In recent times, modern innovations in technology have altered the way we communicate with each other. This essay will discuss how people of like mind from all over the world can connect using technology and form relations, and also believes that this trend is overall a negative development.
The modern communication technology has made it possible for the like-minded people across different countries to connect with each other. Through the use of internet service on computers and smart phones, people get access to various online communities and forums where individuals sharing common interests, ideas or likings can easily make connections. Hence, citizens belonging to different nations, cultures and ethnicities can talk on a common topic and get a chance to know each other. This ultimately results in a friendship-like relation but a virtual one. For example, a Facebook group dedicated to the Indian Premiere League had connected cricket fans from Australia, England and India together and later on these fans became online friends.
Nonetheless, this phenomenon seems to provide some benefits but overall it is a negative development because online relationships are of shorter duration. Some people join various online forums or social sites only to satisfy their personal goals. Initially, an individual appears to be nice, humble and good for a limited period of time, once the purpose is met with; people start ignoring each other. In addition, various settings available on online sites can easily help a person to hide and become a ghost. For example, in a Times of India survey, 60% of adults admitted that their virtual friends lasted till the time they shared a common purpose and after it was achieved they ended their conversations.
To conclude, though the web technology has shrunken the world where people with similar mind can easily connect and chat with each other and make friendship-like relationship, this essay does not welcome this change because these do not last long
- Some young people are leaving the countryside to live in cities and towns, leaving only old people in the countryside. What problems are caused by this issue? What can be done to solve this situation? 73
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 78
- In a cashless society people use more credit cards what are the advantages and advantages 84
- Some people think that foreign visitors should be charged more than locals when they visit cultural and tourist attractions in a country To what extent do you agree with this view 74
- Scientists have been warning for many years about importance of protecting the environment and that we mustlimit the use of energy in our daily lives. Despite warnings many people do not do this. What are the reasons andhow people can be encouraged to tak 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 277, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...this is overall a negative development. The modern communication technology has ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 519, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a time' or simply 'Times'?
Suggestion: a time; Times
...ide and become a ghost. For example, in a Times of India survey, 60% of adults admitted...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, nonetheless, so, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1672.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24137931034 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61209988535 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579937304075 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1832703553 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.615384615 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5384615385 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.38461538462 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284805798527 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10194091774 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0785837777982 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192093854057 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611535680312 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.