The maps show a road system as it is now and the proposed changes in the future to reduce the number of accidents. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagram illustrates a road system at present and the future plan which comes up with some significant changes in order to lessen the accident figures.
Overall, there are two main changes in the proposal which are adding traffic lights and a roundabout.
At present, the road system witnesses four places which are frequently happening accidents. One of the road traffic accident hotspots is located near the school where low lane street meets City Road. Therefore, the suggestion of traffic lights at this crossroads is to solve this problem and it also reduces the number of accidents which occur at the junction of Low Lane and Forest Road.
A big roundabout will be built as the proposal has mentioned at the intersection of City Road and Forest Road, where hotspots of road accidents often take place. This proposition also provides a new replacement access road to the supermarket where the old connecting road has involved collision.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-26 | haphuongpham49 | 72 | view |
- Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show the history and culture of their own country rather than works of the other parts in the world To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football while other people think that taking part in individual sports like tennis or swimming is better Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Despite huge improvements in healthcare the overall standard of physical health in many developed countries is now falling What could be the reason for this trend and what can be done to reverse it 84
- The chart below gives information about Someland s main exports in 2000 20 and future projections for 2025 82
- Nowadays entertainers get paid more than politicians What are the reasons for this Is this a negative or positive development 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 798.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11538461538 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6767867634 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589743589744 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1914668159 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229737234592 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113637268547 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0281178145021 0.0843802449381 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142682075909 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0158381917115 0.0819641961636 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.