The graph shows the number of boys and girls playing sport in an English town in 2012.
The given bar graph compares the figure representing an interest in six different sports( badminton, football, hockey, swimming, cycling, and tennis) among boys and girls of an English town in the year of 2012.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the majority of boys are interested in playing football followed next by tennis, while most of the girls prefer going for swimming. Although girls are ahead in sports like swimming and badminton, boys are more diverted to play other types of sports.
According to the given illustration, boys playing football is three times higher in number in front of just 20 girls. Tennis is the second most favorite sport among boys with 50 participants against only 20 girls. Also, with 15 more boys, girls lack behind boys in cycling as well. Despite a very minute difference, boys tops girls in the game of hockey by a 3:5 ratio (9 girls in comparison to 15 boys).
On the contrary, girls surpass boys in swimming and badminton. Exactly 50 and 40 girls took the former and latter activity, each was higher by 10 as against boys figure.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-27 | giangngoc | 67 | view |
| 2022-11-03 | chikien06 | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-29 | myduyen282 | 93 | view |
| 2022-07-04 | Taytor2609 | 85 | view |
| 2022-02-21 | Puja Bastakoti | 100 | view |
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table compares international tourism in 2009 and 2010 in 9 countries 62
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries 78
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010 84
- The table compares the percentages of people using different functions of their mobile phones between 2006 and 2010 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 37, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... According to the given illustration, boys playing football is three times hig...
^^
Line 5, column 76, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: higher
..., boys playing football is three times higher in number in front of just 20 girls. Tennis is th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, second, so, well, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 925.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89417989418 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53352427971 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613756613757 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9222621532 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.777777778 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.404027123832 0.215688989381 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151457624482 0.103423049105 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0833143389778 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230258240509 0.15604864568 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0849371520564 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.