In recent years, there has been growing interest in the relationship between equality and personal achievement.Some people believe that individuals can achieve more in egalitarian societies. Others believe that high levels of personal achievement are possible only if individuals are free to succeed or fail according to their individual merits.
What is your view of the relationship between equality and personal success ?
The issue of equality and achievement has occupied people throughout history. Some argue that because people vary in terms of talent and initiative, inequality is inevitable. The job of the government is to ensure freedom for each person to achieve his or her personal best. Others believe that because wealth and therefor opportunity tend to concentrate in hands of a few, the government must actively redistribute resources. While I believe there is some truth in both views, the latter is likely to yield greater life satisfaction for the majority.
Societies that are very unequal in terms of income and resources are often credited with great achievements. The United States, for example, has many successful individuals in business and science. Its universities, among the world’s expensive, rank among the top ten in the world and employ a disproportionately large number of Nobel-prize winners. However, such countries also often produce many people without qualifications, and poor prospects.
More egalitarian countries of ten achieve higher average rates of success. Finland and Korea, for example, which invest heavily in free public education for all, tend to rank high in international comparisons of literacy and numeracy rates. Although such countries do not always produce many internationally successful ‘superstar’. They tend to have a high proportion of moderately successful people in terms of employment and income. More importantly, they have lower rates of absolute deprivation and underachievement.
In short, if we allow freedom for individual to achieve their potential, some inequality is inevitable. However, success usually generates wealth, which can be passed from one generation to another resulting in inequality of opportunity regardless of individual merit. It, therefor, makes sense for society to level the playing field.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-22 | tata | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-03 | tathanhthao | 84 | view |
| 2023-04-03 | tata | 61 | view |
| 2022-01-11 | Dhruv Singh | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-24 | Catherinataylor08102008 | 89 | view |
- In many countries women and men are working full time It is therefore logical for women and men to share household works To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Learning to manage money is one of the key aspects of adult life How in your view can individuals best learn to manage their money 67
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 73
- Some cities create housing areas by providing taller buildings Others create housing by building houses on a wider area of land What solution is better Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience Wr 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...arisons of literacy and numeracy rates. Although such countries do not always produce ma...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, while, for example, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65836298932 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23432925871 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619217081851 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.6652875674 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5294117647 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5294117647 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.29411764706 7.06120827912 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23394769746 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691328435033 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623935204077 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127375114614 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.079191072281 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.25 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.