Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him. One such painting is known as attributed to Rembrandt because of its style, and indeed the representation of the woman’s face is very much like that of portraits known to be by Rembrandt. But there are problems with the painting that suggest it could not be a work by Rembrandt.
There are few points made by the reading that the painting is not made by Rembrandt. On the contrary, the lecture opposed those views by the results from complete re-examination.
Firstly, the reading believes that since Rembrandt is famous for his attention on details, the painting cannot be produced by him since the woman in the work wears a servant kind of top but also with an expensive fur coat that a servant cannot afford definitely. Instead, the fur coat was added after Rembrandt done the work a hundred years later. To increase the painting's price, someone painted a fur coat to make it looks more formal advocates by the lecture.
Secondly, the light and shadow is not clear in this painting while Rembrandt was excellent on it. The lecture opposed the opinion made by the reading since before the white fur coat was added, the light and shadow was explicit in the work.
Lastly, the wood panel in the work was been enlarged to make the work more valuable. However, the original wood used to make the panel was found as the same as a piece of work made by Rembrandt which can be an evident that the work was made by Rembrandt.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-02 | nusybah | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-06 | YasamanEsml | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-06 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-23 | Yam Kumar Oli | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-24 | Muggle | 80 | view |
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Television advertising directed towards young children aged two to five should not be allowed Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- It is no longer for a society to regard a man or a woman as a hero 50
- In the United States employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day However many employees want to work a four day week and are willing to accept less pay in order to do so A mandatory policy requiring companies to offer their employee 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 36, Rule ID: WAS_BEEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'was' or 'has been'?
Suggestion: was; has been
...rk. Lastly, the wood panel in the work was been enlarged to make the work more valuable...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 124, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... However, the original wood used to make the panel was found as the same as a pie...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, lastly, look, second, secondly, so, while, kind of, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 22.412803532 45% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 943.0 1373.03311258 69% => OK
No of words: 204.0 270.72406181 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62254901961 5.08290768461 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3741841311 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 145.348785872 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519607843137 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 419.366225166 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7974732823 49.2860985944 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.777777778 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4444444444 7.06452816374 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180751695833 0.272083759551 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0900734022305 0.0996497079465 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740409696073 0.0662205650399 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115984606057 0.162205337803 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389764713963 0.0443174109184 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 53.8541721854 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 12.2367328918 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 63.6247240618 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.