TPO 38 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Leadership is deliberated as one of the impressive characteristic an individual achieve during his life. The question is whether this feature arises naturally or is developed by learning. While there are some families all members of which have an excellent leadership skill, I am a proponent for the opposite view. As a matter of fact, I personally hold the view that leadership does not come naturally and exactly human can learn to be a leader. To prove this notion, examples are as followed.
As a threshold matter, according to scientific scrutinies, there is no gene in human cells that defines the level of leadership one belongs. Therefore, it is not logical to relate such a valued virtue to natural sources. However, there are some factors that affect the leadership in people which can be incorrectly realized that is stemming from natural roots. For example, a youth whose power of leading is remarkable may have flourished in a family the parents of who are seriously involved with this merit in their daily life.
Furthermore, there are quite a few momentous sources of leading strategies tutored in reputational universities that are presented for premium students. Obviously, It is reasonable out comes that a university invest for. If leadership is not gained through learning, such efforts will not be justified. Leadership is a skill, being able to be highly developed by perfect training sessions. Our company manager stands for a strength example whose stunning leadership exhibits his faultless learned methods. He is capable to leader our firm in complex situations and unpredictable markets.
Last but not least, history provides several instances regarding leadership to us. In past, there were a lot of kings taking the leadership of a territory as consequence of hierarchical. Inequity, injustice, misleading and impoverishment were the results of unlearned contributions in leadership. Today, citizens are aware of the importance leading knowledge of a president has. Thus, they reckon this element in their votes during the election times.
To wrap up, leadership is an achieving skill on account of its’ scientific nature. People can develop it via investigating. In addition, history has proved this fact to human for various times.
- TPO 25 Integrated Writing Task 10
- TPO 47 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is important to know about events happening around the world even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life 40
- TPO 37 Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Many people nowadays spend too much money on their pets dogs cats or other animals although there are better uses for this money Use specific reasons and example 83
- TPO 36 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to finish a project completely and then begin another project than to work on two or more projects at the same time Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 81
- TPO 58 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Providing Internet access is just as important as other services such as building roads so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost Use specific reasons and e 52
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 84, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'In the past'?
Suggestion: In the past
...l instances regarding leadership to us. In past, there were a lot of kings taking the l...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 61, Rule ID: YOURS_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: An apostrophe is never used to form possessive case pronouns. Did you mean: 'its'?
Suggestion: its
...hip is an achieving skill on account of its’ scientific nature. People can develop i...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in addition, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1911.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 360.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30833333333 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0389434791 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602777777778 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.3814691809 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0869565217 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.652173913 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21739130435 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180417415031 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0480616612273 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430613660501 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0942604164794 0.150856017488 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539159681707 0.0645574589148 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 58.1214874552 82% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.01818996416 120% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 86.8835125448 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.