You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write about the following topic:
Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
You should write at least 250 words.
There is an argument that financial aids provided to developing countries by rich ones do not solve the problems, which leads to the need for more efficient actions. In my view, support in the form of money shows less practicality than other types of useful aid and consultancy.
On the one hand, financial aids prove beneficial in some ways. First, this provides money for the government to immediately build necessary infrastructures, such as education, healthcare, water, and electricity supplies. This will help stabilize both social and economic situation, resulting in the foundation of further development. Second, financial aids can also provide essential help for those who are suffering from natural disasters, pandemics, and crises, especially when the government does not have enough resources to solve the problems.
On the other hand, there are other practical aids to provide sustainable growth for poor countries. First, leaders of the developed countries can consult their counterparts in need with the suitable methods of guiding the country to prosperity. These can be, for example, inflation reduction, corruption elimination, and investment in technology. Second, developing countries can send experts to train professional educators and workers in many fields such as education, environment, healthcare, and science. This will provide developing countries with qualified human resources who then directly help improve the situation in the long run.
In conclusion, while financial aids bring many benefits in the short term, there are other more efficient actions that ensure sustainable development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-18 | Kubraguran | 56 | view |
| 2021-03-18 | elisabetta_fedele | 67 | view |
| 2020-12-29 | Abdul Karim | 71 | view |
| 2020-10-11 | Nguyễn Quang Hải | view | |
| 2020-07-24 | vtueminh | 89 | view |
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Leisure time in a typical week in hour by sex and employment status 19 67
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Write about the following topic Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather tha 56
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Some people feel that the design of newly constructed buildings in big cities should be controlled by governments Others believe those who finance the construction of a building should be free to design it as 78
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Write about the following topic Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather tha 89
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, then, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1390.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 242.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.74380165289 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02699418649 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611570247934 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1335372955 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.833333333 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18617635234 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0678895239744 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554033905429 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105010198159 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0710968748404 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.