The table below presents the food consumption per a person weekly in a European country in 1992,2002 and 2012
The table provides information about the weekly food consumption of people in a particular European country in 20 years starting in 1992.
As can be inferred from the data, the total intake of every food type except meat had increased after 20 years. It is also apparent that vegetables registered the highest consumption figure out of 5 groups examined, whereas the cheese made up the smallest part of people’s diets in all three years.
The consumptions of vegetables and meat were the highest in people’s diets in 1992, at 2140 grams and 1148 grams respectively. There was a slightly increase in vegetables to reach at 2220 grams in 2012. Meanwhile, the amount of meat people consumed had rose slowly before declining in 1132 grams.
By this time, there was an upward trend in the figure for wheat from 837 grams to 977 grams. Witnessing a similar pattern, the data for bean grew up to 590 grams. By contrast, after going up, 2002 witnessed the unchanged amount of cheese in the next 10 years period.
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam 78
- Some people prefer famous brand of clothing car and other items What are the reasons Do you think advantages outweigh disadvantages 95
- Although more and more people read news on the Internet newspaper will remain the most important source of news Do you agree or disagree 73
- The table below presents the food consumption per a person weekly in a European country in 1992 2002 and 2012 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 137, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
... and 1148 grams respectively. There was a slightly increase in vegetables to reach at 2220 grams in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 839.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82183908046 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61104926798 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632183908046 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.4834904137 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.2222222222 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156893607589 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0632692722764 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0999624880148 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11769058061 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127910209446 0.0819641961636 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.