New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Recent advances in technology have exerted a strong influence on how youngster use their leisure time. It leads to an argument about its beneficial and adverse effects. I am more of the belief that the positive sides of modern technologies surpass the negative ones.
On the one hand, high-tech devices such as a computer or mobile phone give children more chances to access to the whole new world which has plenty of knowledge for them to perceive. This tool is utterly advantageous to search for any information they take interest in because it is incredibly fast, convenient, and accurate. Besides, using this modern equipment can also be the most useful way to reduce stress and relax for children at leisure. Through millions of means of entertainment like films, cartoons or games, they can choose from the variety which they like most and self-enjoy while their parents on duty. Rather than hanging out with friends as the past, this way of enjoying their free time is much more pleasing pleasant, and safer.
On the other hand, overusing these devices can lead to several drawbacks that will do direct harm to children. First of all, spending too much youngster’s free time too much in front of the television or computer screen can undeniably affect children’s health. Even worse, this leads to many incurable diseases like short-sighted or inaccurate development in bones. Furthermore, I am of great concern that future generations will have no connection connectivity within the community and they do not even stay in constant touch with their nearest neighbors on account of using all their time for highly-advanced technologies available in their house.
Inconclusion a nutshell, I am utterly convinced that the advantages of the latest technologies can beat theirs disadvantages provided that their owners make use of them in an efficient intelligent way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-24 | linh allie | 89 | view |
| 2024-10-24 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2024-10-01 | tata | 11 | view |
| 2024-10-01 | tata | 11 | view |
| 2024-09-28 | tata | 56 | view |
- Some people think it is a good thing for senior managers to have much higher salaries than the other workers in a company To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The table below presents the food consumption per a person weekly in a European country in 1992 2002 and 2012 78
- Some people say that organizations are more successful when managers and workers communicate well with each other Other people say that there are more important factors that make organizations successful Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam
- The graph below shows the price in Euros of 800 grams of four types of bread in one European country from 2001 to 2006 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hnologies surpass the negative ones. On the one hand, high-tech devices such ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h more pleasing pleasant, and safer. On the other hand, overusing these devic...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 663, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... technologies available in their house. Inconclusion a nutshell, I a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, furthermore, so, while, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19407894737 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88469962898 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628289473684 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4263249914 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.461538462 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3846153846 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29809906328 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0869092056483 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665782299692 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170741010312 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349739185801 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.