Some people believe that eventually all jobs will be done by artificially intelligent robots.
What is your opinion?
We presently live in a fast-paced world and technological advances have revolutionized almost every facet of life. No area seems to have felt this impact like employment such that people are already speculating that before long, every available work will be robotically-assisted. While this may sound feasible for some menial jobs, work that requires complex skills and advanced cerebral inputs will always require humans for execution.
Robots may indeed have some roles to play in the implementation of tasks that require simple instructions. In other words, elementary functions such as opening doors in offices, copying materials from one form to another and so on can be performed by droids. For instance, some new generation companies have taken advantage of the cost-effectiveness and time-saving advantages machines provide to run their day to day tasks. For example, the number of cashiers in many Nigerian financial institutions has fallen significantly since the introduction of automated teller machines.
Without a doubt, not all jobs can be done by automation and this is where robotic functions are limited. Firstly, human intellect is completely required to practice medicine, a vast field that needs not only a lifetime dedication but also keen interest. It is unfathomable how a machine will be relevant here. Besides, machines cannot reproduce themselves to perpetuate the human race. This is because a machine can never become a human till the close of the age. Lastly, when there are psychological disorders such as emotional imbalance, specialists in the field as psychiatrists are often needed to provide the necessary care. It seems unlikely that machines can function in this capacity.
To conclude, that machines will ultimately usurp man and take over all his work seems a mere fantasy. While bots may be useful in elementary jobs as dispensing money and controlling entrances to premises, they are likely to be found wanting in the aspect of care, human procreation and emotional support. 317 words,
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-02 | ADQOR | 89 | view |
| 2020-04-25 | dallyverma | 81 | view |
| 2020-04-25 | dallyverma | 61 | view |
- In the past when students did a university degree they tended to study in their own country Nowadays they have more opportunity to study abroad Do the advantages of this development outgweighs the disadvantages 89
- Formal examinations are the only effective way to assess a student s performance Continuous assessment such as coursework and projects is not a satisfactory way to do this To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- In the time past photographers used to give us real images of people and places Nowadays it is difficult to trust what they give us Is this a negative or positive development 84
- Some people believe that eventually all jobs will be done by artificially intelligent robots What is your opinion 89
- Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters Do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 438, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll always require humans for execution. Robots may indeed have some roles to pla...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, lastly, may, so, while, for example, for instance, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1720.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39184952978 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10746707907 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2244348134 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.5 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9375 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160733981929 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0476366405414 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604070892583 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0946436951464 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0187228774647 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.