Some people believe that electing a constitutional assembly is the best way to address modifications to the constitution, while others believe that a group of experts should be responsible for this task.
A constitution must reflect a country and its people. So, if a country’s constitution has to be modified this modification will have to be addressed by an assembly elected by these same people. Considering these first statement, it is coherent to say that in the case of Chile, if finally a new constitutions has to be written, an elected constitutional assembly will be probably a better option than a group of experts.
One of the main reasons to make such an affirmation it is related with the origins or roots of democracy itself. The meaning of democracy refers to the power of the demos. That is, the power of the people. In this regard, in the first instance, it seems that an assembly elected by the citizens is closer to that meaning than a group of experts which will be closer to the meaning of aristocracy, that is, a governance of the best. Although it is not easy to find examples that confirm this statement there is a recent case in the region that can serve as a reference. I am talking about the Constitutional Assembly of Ecuador in 2007-2008, who takes place in the town of Montecristi. After a long process, that assembly formed a new constitution that brought stability to the country after several tumultuous and unstable years. The same can be replicated in Chile, although the result will be uncertain.
Other reason to support the formation of a constitutional assembly is related with the problem of representation itself. Nowadays, due to the lost of credibility, confidence, and trust towards politicians and experts in general people is demanding more direct forms of representation in order to have the control of their lives. As a recent survey shows, the 75% of the Chilean citizens want a constitutional assembly, while the 14% support the option of the group of experts. But, beyond this data, the relevant is that more than a half of the population took part during the last year in some form of protest. A fact that indicates that people want to decide and take part in the political decisions.
Concluding, if the Chilean politicians really wants to retrieve the sense of democracy and the confidence of people I think that the best way to solve or to manage the process of a constitutional change will be making the process as direct as possible, so the people see theirs desires, wishes and hopes reflected in a constitution.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-05 | Gillian Katherine Ord | 73 | view |
| 2020-07-14 | Gillian Katherine Ord | 73 | view |
| 2020-07-14 | Gillian Katherine Ord | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that electing a constitutional assembly is the best way to address modifications to the constitution while others believe that a group of experts should be responsible for this task 73
- Which of these actions do you think needs to be addressed most urgently Stopping looting and arson in city centres Improving health care education and pensions Electing a constitutional assembly 90
- Which of these forms of protest make the most impact Going on strike Participating in marches Disseminating information through social media 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Playing computer games is a waste of time Children should not be allowed to play them 76
- Which of these actions do you think needs to be addressed most urgently Stopping looting and arson in city centres Improving health care education and pensions Electing a constitutional assembly 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 55, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[4]
Message: “So , if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... must reflect a country and its people. So, if a country’s constitution has to be modi...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 296, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'constitution'?
Suggestion: constitution
... in the case of Chile, if finally a new constitutions has to be written, an elected constitut...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, really, so, while, as to, i think, in general, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1968.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 409.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81173594132 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97817376141 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466992665037 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 620.1 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.8849878458 48.9658058833 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.764705882 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0588235294 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314767385882 0.236089414692 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0870388971172 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0713868571701 0.0737576698707 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183813352023 0.150856017488 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561374665087 0.0645574589148 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.