Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skill. Do you agree or disagree?
It is perceived by an array of people that less emphasis is put on application of practical concepts in educational sector as more stress is laid on cramming the facts and figures. This essay firmly favors the notion that firstly, it is a long-standing tradition without being questioned and secondly, it is due to lack of resources to teach the same.
First and the foremost point is that the lack of needed resources in the premise of the institute obstruct the practice of learning by doing. There are teachers who are pure academicians and lack any industry experience with them. Not only this, what If there are no laboratories in the schools and colleges? This will refrain the students from learning the processes and practicality of the concepts. For example, if a teacher has to demonstrate working of any Computer Numerical Code (CNC) machine to a mechanical engineering student, this cannot be done unless there is a CNC lab in the institute. Hence, lack of such resources and expertise will not result in acquiring the practical skills.
Secondly, there is a tendency among the students to cram the answers or notes provided by the teachers. Beyond this they are unable to think as their creativity is blocked the moment educators start feeding them with readymade material. For example, lot of faculty have a habit of dictating the notes in the classes. In such a scenario, no practical skills are developed within the students. Therefore, it is the need of the hour that instructors start involving students in brainstorming and discussion so as to make the learning meaningful.
To conclude, I opine that for any kind of learning to be effective and enduring, it is important to make available the resources in the schools and colleges/universities and also discourage the culture of passive learning in the classes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-29 | ielts_tony | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-09 | tsabatt | 61 | view |
| 2022-09-23 | Marlen Boshra | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-05 | Hemantbali | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-15 | ali.khm | 78 | view |
- Governments and big companies should work together to reverse environmental damage rather than expecting individuals to take responsibility To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- Some people say that in all levels of education from primary schools to universities too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skill Do you agree or disagree 73
- The rise of convenience foods has helped people keep up with the speed of the modern life style Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantage 73
- More and more wild animals are on the verge of extinction and others are on the endangered list What are the reasons for this What can be done to solve this problem 78
- You have decided to resign from your work in order to try a new field Write a letter of resignation to your boss In your letter Tell your boss of your decision and explain why you are leaving Explain what you have learnt from your current job and how you 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 505, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...tudents in brainstorming and discussion so as to make the learning meaningful. To co...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, as to, for example, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1535.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01633986928 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01344226666 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542483660131 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4292423571 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.642857143 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156069242673 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0515362719105 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518126226814 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0942134481225 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278297087198 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.