Some people think the money spent in developing the technology for space exploration is not justified. There are more beneficial ways to spend this money.
To what extent do you agree or disagree
I agree with the view that there is no justification for investing in space exploration technology. This is true especially in the period when there are other beneficial projects.
However, it is also true that the population of Earth is approaching its peak. Exploring space could lead to the discovery of another habitable planet where the Earth's excess population can relocate to when necessary. But that is one uncertain and unassertive project that may not benefit the people despite its huge funds. So whether investing in it is profitable or not is debatable. Climate change and clean energy are just another projects that deserve investments.
The effects of climate change are there for us to see. From declining agricultural products to reducing water supplies due to insufficient rainfall. Avoiding such climatic catastrophes is possible if enough money is invested into climate technology instead of space exploration. If this is done, rain could be made to fall or not when and where it is necessary, just as China did during the opening and closing ceremonies of Beijing Olympics 2011. This climate technology could eventually increase the availability of both agricultural products and water.
As well, it could be beneficial for both the government and the people should cleaner energy be invested on as this will lead to less health problems. Electric vehicles, for example, are widely believed to exhaust zero emission, which is safer for the environment than is fumes from gas vehicles. If substantial investment is made on this electric-vehicle technology, there will be unpolluted environment, at least on motorways.
In conclusion, hardly is space exploration important at the moment, so I would suggest that the government should not spend money in developing its technology. Instead, climate and energy technologies should be invested on since they not only provide food and water but also aid good air quality.
- In the time past photographers used to give us real images of people and places Nowadays it is difficult to trust what they give us Is this a negative or positive development 84
- Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters Do you agree or disagree 84
- You have received a letter from your friend who has recently decided to move to your city Your friend has asked if he she can stay with you for two weeks while they look for a place to live Write a letter to your friend In your letter explain you are happ 56
- Some people believe that eventually all jobs will be done by artificially intelligent robots What is your opinion 89
- Some people think the money spent in developing the technology for space exploration is not justified There are more beneficial ways to spend this money To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 12, column 16, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'hardly' is usually put after the verb 'is'.
Suggestion: is hardly
...least on motorways. In conclusion, hardly is space exploration important at the mome...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, well, at least, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1652.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36363636364 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0005902607 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561688311688 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8055706799 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1764705882 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1176470588 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41176470588 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182435320318 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0544417949027 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510086054102 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106452654444 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422869572883 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.